The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
For Public Sociology
Abstract
Responding to the growing gap between the sociological ethos and the world we study, the challenge of public sociology is to engage multiple publics in multiple ways. These public sociologies should not be left out in the cold, but brought into the framework of our discipline. In this way we make public sociology a visible and legitimate enterprise, and, thereby, invigorate the discipline as a whole. Accordingly, if we map out the division of sociological labor, we discover antagonistic interdependence among four types of knowledge: professional, critical, policy, and public. In the best of all worlds the flourishing of each type of sociology is a condition for the flourishing of all, but they can just as easily assume pathological forms or become victims of exclusion and subordination. This field of power beckons us to explore the relations among the four types of sociology as they vary historically and nationally, and as they provide the template for divergent individual careers. Finally, comparing disciplines points to the umbilical chord that connects sociology to the world of publics, underlining sociology's particular investment in the defense of civil society, itself beleaguered by the encroachment of markets and states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere
(2006) · Habermas · doi:10.4324/9780203020166-5 · Cited by 4,779
Warner, M. (2002) · Public Culture · doi:10.1215/08992363-14-1-49 · Cited by 3,862
The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers
Lakatos, I. (1978) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511621123 · Cited by 3,045
Pager, D. (2003) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/374403 · Cited by 2,840
Embodied health movements: new approaches to social movements in health
Brown, P., Zavestoski, S., McCormick, S., Mayer, B., Morello‐Frosch, R., & Gasior Altman, R. (2004) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00378.x · Cited by 631
Democratic Contraction? Political Consequences of Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States
Uggen, C., & Manza, J. (2002) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240206700601 · Cited by 497
Cited by
`How many cases do I need?': On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research
Small, M. L. (2009) · Ethnography · doi:10.1177/1466138108099586 · Cited by 2,023
Robots and organization studies: Why robots might not want to steal your job
Fleming, P. (2019) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840618765568 · Cited by 297
Say my name? Anonymity or not in elite interviewing
Ellersgaard, C. H., Ditlevsen, K., & Larsen, A. G. (2022) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2021.1932717 · Cited by 31
W. E. B. Du Bois: Reform, Will, and the Veil
England, L., & Warner, W. K. (2013) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sos188 · Cited by 28
Contested knowledges : Negotiating the epistemic politics of engaged activist ethnography
Scharenberg, A. (2026) · Ethnography · doi:10.1177/14661381231169167 · Cited by 11
Riviera, E. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23248 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Burawoy, M.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-28
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W2113059945
- Cited by
- 1,921
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 176.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.