Cited by 32Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsFocus Groups and Qualitative MethodsData Analysis and Archiving

Say my name? Anonymity or not in elite interviewing

Open access
Ellersgaard, Christoph Houman, Ditlevsen, Kia, Larsen, Anton Grau·2022·International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Abstract

This article discusses anonymizing elite interviewees. Based on our experiences with interviewing professional elites and ultra-elites in different research projects, we describe how the types of conflicts involving analysis and publication change when interviewees are not promised anonymity. We discuss how contextualizing the elite positions of anonymized interviewees becomes increasingly difficult in interviews with persons who hold prestigious positions of authority and are interviewed in their official capacity. Masking interviewees can create conflicts with regard to the researcher’s presentation of results, the transparency of the research and the ability of interviewees to talk back. We show how working with non-anonymized interviewees – and even using excerpts from interviews on public radio – can be an option in qualitative research. However, non-anonymized interviews with elites should be considered only in some instances and may seriously hamper the validity of the material in other cases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13645579.2021.1932717

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellersgaard, C. H., Ditlevsen, K., & Larsen, A. G.
Affiliations
  • Copenhagen Business School (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Roskilde University (DK)
Corresponding author
Ellersgaard, Christoph Houman
Venue
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Published
2021-06-06
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
673-686
ISSN
  • 1364-5579 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5300
OpenAlex
W3171364946
Cited by
31
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Social Research Methodology (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • RUCforsk (Roskilde University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
The Independent Research Fund Denmark
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
Keywords
anonymity, elite interviewing, professional elites, research ethics, research transparency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review