Cited by 358Social Policy and Reform StudiesElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationPolicy Transfer and Learning

Social policy responsiveness in developed democracies

Brooks, Clem, Manza, Jeff·2006·American Sociological Review

Abstract

Do mass policy preferences influence the policy output of welfare states in developed democracies? This is an important issue for welfare state theory and research, and this article presents an analysis that builds from analytical innovations developed in the emerging literature on linkages between mass opinion and public policy. The authors analyze a new dataset combining a measure of social policy preferences with data on welfare state spending, alongside controls for established causal factors behind social policy-making. The analysis provides evidence that policy preferences exert a significant influence over welfare state output. Guided also by statistical tests for endogeneity, the authors find that cross-national differences in the level of policy preferences help to account for a portion of the differences among social, Christian, and liberal welfare state regimes. The results have implications for developing fruitful connections between welfare state scholarship, comparative opinion research, and recent opinion/policy studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000312240607100306

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aggregate public opinion does not seem to be a compelling determinant of welfare state output.

    “In any case, aggregate public opinion-i.e., support averaged across the whole population-does not seem to be a compelling determinant of welfare state output.”

    From COVID-19 and welfare state support: the case of universal basic income (2022) · cites this paper as Brooks and Manza (2006)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brooks, C., & Manza, J.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University, Bloomington
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
2006-06
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
474-494
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
OpenAlex
W2124600012
Cited by
358
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
54.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
Keywords
social policy preferences, social spending, policy responsiveness, welfare regimes, liberal welfare regime, public opinion, endogeneity, advanced democracies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review