The DOI matches its Crossref record; 126 of the 126 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Cultural Tastes Shape Personal Networks
Abstract
This article examines the relationship between different forms of cultural taste and the density of social contacts across alternative types of network relations classified by average tie strength. The author builds on Bourdieu's ([1986] 2001) classic statement on the “forms of capital” (economic, social, and cultural) and the conversion dynamics among them, and on DiMaggio's (1987) connection between cultural tastes and sociability. He hypothesizes that (1) in addition to cultural tastes being determined by network relations, cultural tastes are used to form and sustain those networks. Furthermore he expects that (2) highbrow culture taste will be less likely to be converted into social capital beyond immediate strong-tie circles due to its more restricted, “assetspecific” nature. Because of its generalized appeal, taste for popular culture will be more likely to be associated with weak-tie network density. The results broadly support these hypotheses: a model that specifies an effect of culture on network density provides a better fit to the data than the traditional conception of networks as determining taste. In addition using log-linear models and instrumental-variable methods, I show that popular culture consumption has a positive impact on weak-tie network density but not strong-tie network density, while highbrow culture consumption selectively increases strong-tie density but has no appreciable effect on weak ties, net of standard socioeconomic variables. These findings help to shed light on the mechanisms that translate mastery of different types of cultural knowledge into integration across distant social positions or closure around strong group boundaries. The author also discusses the implications of the results for current models describing the transformation of cultural into social resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · Cited by 18,567
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6637 · Cited by 16,594
Bourdieu, P. (2002) · Readings in Economic Sociology · doi:10.1002/9780470755679.ch15 · Cited by 13,906
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Heider, F. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10628-000 · Cited by 13,457
Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology
Portes, A. (1998) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1 · Cited by 12,037
The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations.
Newcomb, T., & Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 11,822
Cited by
Motivation and justification: a dual process model of culture in action.
Vaisey, S. (2009) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/597179 · Cited by 1,279
Tastes, ties, and time: a new social network dataset using Facebook.com
Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A., & Christakis, N. (2008) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2008.07.002 · Cited by 1,024
Forage for Thought: Mobilizing Codes in the Movement for Grass-fed Meat and Dairy Products
Weber, K., Heinze, K. L., & DeSoucey, M. (2008) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.53.3.529 · Cited by 787
The Megaphone Effect: Taste and Audience in Fashion Blogging
McQuarrie, E. F., Miller, J., & Phillips, B. J. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/669042 · Cited by 537
DellaPosta, D., Shi, Y., & Macy, M. (2015) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/681254 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Lizardo, O.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 778-807
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W2054852649
- Cited by
- 607
- References
- 126
- FWCI
- 32.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Cultural Tastes Shape Personal Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000312240607100504
- The paper
- Lizardo, O. (2006). How Cultural Tastes Shape Personal Networks. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100504
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.