The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The International Women's Movement and Women's Political Representation, 1893–2003
Abstract
Women's political representation, once considered unacceptable by politicians and their publics, is now actively encouraged by powerful international actors. In this article, the authors ask how the growth and discourse of the international women's movement affected women's acquisition of political power over time. To answer this question, they use event history techniques to address women's political representation in more than 150 countries over 110 years (1893–2003). They consider multiple political outcomes: female suffrage, first female parliamentarian, and achievement of 10, 20, and 30 percent women in a country's national legislature. The findings show that increasing global pressure for the inclusion of women in international politics and the changing discourse of the international women's movement help to explain women's acquisition of these multiple political outcomes. Furthermore, by adding these concepts to traditional domestic models of women in politics, the authors demonstrate that country-level political, social structural, and cultural characteristics cause countries to act in conjunction with, or in opposition to, these global pressures. This is the first time that research on women in politics has considered such a comprehensive list of countries, time points, and outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women
Kanter, R. M. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226425 · Cited by 3,154
Cited by
Worldwide Trends in the Criminal Regulation of Sex, 1945 to 2005
Frank, D. J., Camp, B. J., & Boutcher, S. A. (2010) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122410388493 · Cited by 295
Women’s Political Empowerment: A New Global Index, 1900–2012
Sundström, A., Paxton, P., Wang, Y.-T., & Lindberg, S. I. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.016 · Cited by 292
Self-citationIntersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women's Political Representation Worldwide
HUGHES, M. M. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055411000293 · Cited by 286
Self-citationCivil War and Trajectories of Change in Women's Political Representation in Africa, 1985–2010
Hughes, M. M., & Tripp, A. M. (2015) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sov003 · Cited by 197
Self-citationAutocratization Changing Nature?
Alizada, N., Boese, V. A., Lundstedt, M., Morrison, K., Natsika, N., Sato, Y., Tai, H., & Lindberg, S. I. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4052548 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Green, J. L.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 898-920
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W2069744833
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The International Women's Movement and Women's Political Representation, 1893–2003. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000312240607100602
- The paper
- Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Green, J. L. (2006). The International Women's Movement and Women's Political Representation, 1893–2003. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.