The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women's Political Representation Worldwide
Abstract
The majority of the world's countries have implemented policies designed to advance the political representation of women and/or minority groups. Yet we do not yet understand how these disparate policies affect the election of minority women. In this article, I draw on theories of intersectionality to conduct the first worldwide analysis of the effects of gender and minority quotas on minority women's representation in national legislatures. Using hierarchical linear modeling, I analyze how quotas influence the election of women from more than 300 racial, ethnic, and religious groups across 81 countries. I find that policies designed to promote the political representation of women and minority groups interact to produce diverse but predictable outcomes for minority women. Although quotas are ostensibly designed to promote diversity and inclusiveness, the quota policies in effect today rarely challenge majority men's dominance of national legislatures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.
Longford, N. T., Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2075823 · Cited by 18,724
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
Davidian, M. (2003) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2003.s288 · Cited by 13,723
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510
The Complexity of Intersectionality
McCall, L. (2005) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/426800 · Cited by 6,682 · cited 1×
“Grounded in black and multiracial feminist thought, theories of intersectionality conceptualize sexism, racism, and other forms of bigotry as interrelated systems that create “multiple barriers” to power (Collins 2000; Crenshaw 1989; 1994; Glenn 1999; McCall 2005; Weber 2001).”
BackgroundMultilevel analysis techniques and applications
Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2002) · Cited by 6,003
Crenshaw, K. (1998) · Feminism And Politics · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198782063.003.0016 · Cited by 5,672
Fenichel Pitkin, H. (1967) · doi:10.1525/9780520340503 · Cited by 5,162
Multicultural citizenship: a liberal theory of minority rights
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2995 · Cited by 4,896
Cited by
Civil War and Trajectories of Change in Women's Political Representation in Africa, 1985–2010
Hughes, M. M., & Tripp, A. M. (2015) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sov003 · Cited by 197
Self-citationQuotas and intersectionality: Ethnicity and gender in candidate selection
Celis, K., Erzeel, S., Mügge, L., & Damstra, A. (2014) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/0192512113507733 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- HUGHES, M. M.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 604-620
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2116488202
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 36.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women's Political Representation Worldwide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0003055411000293
- The paper
- HUGHES, M. M. (2011). Intersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women's Political Representation Worldwide. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055411000293
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.