The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diversity in Everyday Discourse: The Cultural Ambiguities and Consequences of “Happy Talk”
Abstract
Few words in the current American lexicon are as ubiquitous and ostensibly uplifting as diversity. The actual meanings and functions of the term, however, are difficult to pinpoint. In this article we use in-depth interviews conducted in four major metropolitan areas to explore popular conceptions of diversity. Although most Americans respond positively at first, our interviews reveal that their actual understandings are undeveloped and often contradictory. We highlight tensions between idealized conceptions and complicated realities of difference in social life, as well as the challenge of balancing group-based commitments against traditional individualist values. Respondents, we find, define diversity in abstract, universal terms even though most of their concrete references and experiences involve interactions with racial others. Even the most articulate and politically engaged respondents find it difficult to talk about inequality in the context of a conversation focused on diversity. Informed by critical theory, we situate these findings in the context of unseen privileges and normative presumptions of whiteness in mainstream U.S. culture. We use these findings and interpretations to elaborate on theories of the intersection of racism and colorblindness in the new millennium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
White Women, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Whiteness
Frankenburg, R. (1993) · doi:10.4324/9780203973431 · Cited by 3,308
Atheists as “other”: Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society
Edgell, P., Gerteis, J., & Hartmann, D. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100203 · Cited by 914
Self-citationWhite Supremacy and Racism in the Post-Civil Rights Era
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2001) · doi:10.1515/9781685850272 · Cited by 897
Cited by
Racialized Equity Labor, University Appropriation and Student Resistance
Lerma, V., Hamilton, L. T., & Nielsen, K. (2020) · Social Problems · doi:10.1093/socpro/spz011 · Cited by 123
Diversity and Inclusion Metrics in Subset Selection
Mitchell, M., Baker, D., Moorosi, N., Denton, R., Hutchinson, B., Hanna, A., Gebru, T., & Morgenstern, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3375627.3375832 · Cited by 87
Jones, V. A., & Reddick, R. J. (2017) · The Journal of Negro Education · doi:10.7709/jnegroeducation.86.3.0204 · Cited by 62
Warikoo, N. K., & Fuhr, C. (2014) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3108 · Cited by 61
Warikoo, N., & Bloemraad, I. (2018) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2017.1329006 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell, J. M., & Hartmann, D.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 895-914
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W2110729564
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity in Everyday Discourse: The Cultural Ambiguities and Consequences of “Happy Talk”. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000312240707200603
- The paper
- Bell, J. M., & Hartmann, D. (2007). Diversity in Everyday Discourse: The Cultural Ambiguities and Consequences of “Happy Talk”. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.