The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Divergent Pathways of Gentrification: Racial Inequality and the Social Order of Renewal in Chicago Neighborhoods
Open accessAbstract
Gentrification has inspired considerable debate, but direct examination of its uneven evolution across time and space is rare. We address this gap by developing a conceptual framework on the social pathways of gentrification and introducing a method of systematic social observation using Google Street View to detect visible cues of neighborhood change. We argue that a durable racial hierarchy governs residential selection and, in turn, gentrifying neighborhoods. Integrating census data, police records, prior street-level observations, community surveys, proximity to amenities, and city budget data on capital investments, we find that the pace of gentrification in Chicago from 2007 to 2009 was negatively associated with the concentration of blacks and Latinos in neighborhoods that either showed signs of gentrification or were adjacent and still disinvested in 1995. Racial composition has a threshold effect, however, attenuating gentrification when the share of blacks in a neighborhood is greater than 40 percent. Consistent with theories of neighborhood stigma, we also find that collective perceptions of disorder, which are higher in poor minority neighborhoods, deter gentrification, while observed disorder does not. These results help explain the reproduction of neighborhood racial inequality amid urban transformation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods
Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/210356 · Cited by 2,485
Self-citationSeeing Disorder: Neighborhood Stigma and the Social Construction of “Broken Windows”
Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2004) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/019027250406700401 · Cited by 1,436
Self-citation
Cited by
Deep Learning the City: Quantifying Urban Perception at a Global Scale
Dubey, A., Naik, N., Parikh, D., Raskar, R., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_12 · Cited by 513
Gentrification, Displacement, and the Role of Public Investment
Zuk, M., Bierbaum, A. H., Chapple, K., Gorska, K., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2018) · Journal of Planning Literature · doi:10.1177/0885412217716439 · Cited by 455
Gentrification and residential mobility in Philadelphia
Ding, L., Hwang, J., & Divringi, E. (2016) · Regional Science and Urban Economics · doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.09.004 · Cited by 336
Self-citationBesbris, M., & Faber, J. W. (2017) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/socf.12378 · Cited by 101
A spatial analysis of climate gentrification in Orleans Parish, Louisiana post-Hurricane Katrina
Aune, K. T., Gesch, D., & Smith, G. S. (2020) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109384 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Hwang, J., & Sampson, R. J.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-06-12
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 726-751
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W1969284902
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 96.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Divergent Pathways of Gentrification: Racial Inequality and the Social Order of Renewal in Chicago Neighborhoods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0003122414535774
- The paper
- Hwang, J., & Sampson, R. J. (2014). Divergent Pathways of Gentrification: Racial Inequality and the Social Order of Renewal in Chicago Neighborhoods. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414535774
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.