Cited by 57Cognitive Abilities and TestingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesAging and Gerontology Research

The Intercohort Decline in Verbal Ability: Does It Exist?

Wilson, James A., Gove, Walter R.·1999·American Sociological Review

Abstract

Has there been a long-term intercohort decline in verbal ability beginning in the early part of this century? Recent analyses by Alwin and Glenn using data from the General Social Survey (GSS) strongly support such a trend. This decline, however, is not consistent with a substantial literature on adult cognitive development. We argue that Alwin's and Glenn's analyses confuse cohort effects with aging effects, apparently because of (1) a reliance on outdated assumptions, or “side information,” regarding the relationship between age and verbal ability; (2) the treatment of the relationship between age and verbal ability as linear rather than curvilinear; and (3) the high degree of collinearity between age and cohort in the GSS data. The observed trend in the GSS data appears to be explained best by a positive relationship between age and verbal ability rather than by a decline in ability across cohorts. Because the GSS data involve a set of national probability samples conducted over a 22–year period, our analyses complement and strengthen the credibility of the literature on adult cognitive development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000312249906400208

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The negative cohort effects on verbal ability reported by Alwin may be due to confusing cohort effects with aging, treating the relationship between age and verbal ability as linear rather than curvilinear.

    “The negative cohort effects on verbal ability reported by Alwin (1991) may be due to confusing cohort effects with aging, treating the relationship between age and verbal ability as linear rather than curvilinear (Wilson & Gove, 1999).”

    From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Wilson & Gove, 1999

  • Direct comparison of different cohorts at one point in time confounds cohort with age effects, whereas comparison of cohorts at the same age but different points in time confounds cohort and period effects.

    “That is, the direct comparison of different cohorts at one point in time confounds cohort with age effects, whereas comparison of cohorts at the same age but different points in time confound cohort and period effects (cf. Ryder, 1965; Schaie, 1965; Wilson & Gove, 1999).”

    From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Wilson & Gove, 1999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, J. A., & Gove, W. R.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1999-04
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
253-266
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
OpenAlex
W2313766163
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
verbal ability, adult cognitive development, cohort effects, age-related changes, General Social Survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review