The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Implication of Lymph Node Metastasis on Survival in Patients with Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
Abstract
Though survival for well-differentiated thyroid cancer is very good, specific populations suffer greater recurrence and mortality. Defining these cohorts can significantly influence prognosis and extent of treatment. This study, using a large, multi-institutional database, seeks to determine how the presence of lymph node disease in patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer affects outcome. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database is a large-scale sample of 14 per cent of the U.S. population. It was used to identify patients with papillary and follicular thyroid carcinomas and identify the prognostic implications of lymph node metastasis. Additional factors, including presence of metastasis, age, and tumor size, were compared using multivariate and χ 2 analyses. Of 19,918 patients identified, lymph node status was known for 9,904 (49.7%). On multivariate analysis, age >45 years, presence of distant metastasis, large tumor size, and lymph node involvement significantly predicted poor outcome. Overall survival at 14 years was 82 per cent for node negative and 79 per cent for node positive patients ( P < 0.05). This study shows that the survival of patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer is adversely affected by lymph node metastases. The optimum treatment for this cohort needs further delineation, as particular populations are at greater risk of recurrence and death.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haugen, B. R., Alexander, E. K., Bible, K. C., Doherty, G. M., Mandel, S. J., Nikiforov, Y. E., Pacini, F., Randolph, G. W., Sawka, A. M., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2016) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 · Cited by 16,535
Cooper, D. S., Doherty, G. M., Haugen, B. R., Kloos, R. T., Lee, S. L., Mandel, S. J., Mazzaferri, E. L., McIver, B., Pacini, F., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2009) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2009.0110 · Cited by 6,707
Stack, B. C., Ferris, R. L., Goldenberg, D., Haymart, M., Shaha, A., Sheth, S., Sosa, J. A., & Tufano, F. T. A. T. A. (2012) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2011.0312 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Podnos, Y. D., Smith, D., Wagman, L. D., & Ellenhorn, J. D. I.
- Venue
- The American Surgeon™
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 731-734
- ISSN
- 0003-1348 (ISSN-L)
- 1555-9823
- OpenAlex
- W113387939
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Implication of Lymph Node Metastasis on Survival in Patients with Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000313480507100907
- The paper
- Podnos, Y. D., Smith, D., Wagman, L. D., & Ellenhorn, J. D. I. (2005). The Implication of Lymph Node Metastasis on Survival in Patients with Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. The American Surgeon™. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313480507100907
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.