Cited by 39

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Equestrian Injury is Costly, Disabling, and Frequently Preventable: The Imperative for Improved Safety Awareness

Guyton, Kristina, Houchen-Wise, Emily, Peck, Ellen, Mayberry, John·2013·The American Surgeon™

Abstract

Horse-related injury can be severe and disabling. We investigated the causes, severity, and costs of equestrian injury with the goal of injury prevention. A retrospective review of horse-related injuries from 2001 to 2008 identified 231 patients with a mean age of 38 years and a mean Injury Severity Score of 11 (range, 1 to 45). Mean length of stay was 5.5 days. Fifty-nine patients (25%) required 84 surgeries. Helmet use was 20 per cent and of the 172 patients not wearing a helmet while mounted, 38 per cent received potentially preventable head injuries. There were three deaths of which two were the result of intracranial hemorrhage in riders not wearing a helmet. Mean hospital charge was $29,800 for a total of $6.9 million. Ninety-one patients completed a survey regarding causation and disability. Thirty-four per cent reported wearing a helmet at the time of injury. Forty per cent reported that poor environmental factors contributed, 30 per cent reported poor horse and rider pairing, and 9 per cent reported equipment failure. Fifty-nine per cent reported long-term disabilities. Compared with the general population, respondents had diminution in their ability to perform usual daily activities associated with physical problems, diminution in social function, and higher bodily pain. We conclude that equestrian injury is costly, disabling, and frequently preventable.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000313481307900134

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. AnthonyD.W. The Horse, the Wheel, and Language. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007.
  2. 10.1097/ta.0b013e318031b5d4 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.016 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31817dac43 · DOI
  5. 10.1249/JSR.0b013e3181f32056 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/09638280310001629688 · DOI
  7. Bixby-Hammett D.M., 1987, Am Fam Physician, 36, 209
  8. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31809fec16 · DOI
  9. 10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1437 · DOI
  10. 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02707.x · DOI
  11. Northey G., 2003, N Z Med J, 116, U601
  12. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.11.007 · DOI
  13. 10.1097/00007611-200295040-00014 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1001/jama.283.10.1326 · DOI
  15. 10.1136/bjsm.33.1.46 · DOI
  16. 10.2746/042516406776563314 · DOI
  17. 10.1097/00042752-199607000-00006 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0020-1383(00)00108-X · DOI
  19. Griffen R., 1987, Phys Sportsmed, 15, 105
  20. 10.1177/036354659001800114 · DOI
  21. 10.1191/0269215503cr639oa · DOI
  22. 10.1186/1752-2897-3-2 · DOI
  23. Haeusler J.M., 2006, J Trauma, 61, 723
  24. 10.1097/TA.0b013e318031afe3 · DOI
  25. 10.1136/ip.5.3.203 · DOI
  26. Condie C., 1993, Public Health Rep, 108, 121
  27. 10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30641-X · DOI
  28. 10.1159/000084280 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.jen.2005.08.009 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00277.x · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Guyton, K., Houchen-Wise, E., Peck, E., & Mayberry, J.
Affiliations
From the Division of Trauma, Critical Care, and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery L611, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
Venue
The American Surgeon™
Published
2013-01
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
76-83
ISSN
  • 0003-1348
  • 1555-9823
Cited by
39
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review