Cited by 7Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersNeonatal Health and Biochemistry

The interference by HbF on HbA1c (BM Test HbA1c) measurement in enzymatic method

Open access
Nitta, Takenori, Yamashiro, Yasuhiro, Hattori, Yukio, Ezumi, Tomoko, Nishioka, Mituaki, Nakamura, Junji·2015·Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine

Abstract

Background: High performance liquid chromatography and immunological and enzymatic methods are known as the methods for HbA1c measurement. However, the differences in the principles of the methods may cause slight discrepancies, which become problems especially in the regions where hemoglobinopathies that have high HbF concentrations are commonly seen. In this report, we discuss the effect of HbF on the HbA1c measurement by the enzymatic method (BM Test HbA1c) which can be applied to automatic analyzer of high sample throughput. Methods: Thirty-five samples (HbF concentration: between 1.4 and 90.1%) and 68 samples (HbF concentration: <1.0%) were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (Tosoh G8) and BM Test HbA1c. The results by BM Test HbA1c were compared with those by the high performance liquid chromatography and International Federation of Clinical Chemistry reference method. Results: The high and positive correlation coefficient was demonstrated between the enzymatic and International Federation of Clinical Chemistry methods for the samples with normal HbF concentration. The samples with high HbF concentration exhibited high and positive correlation coefficient, although the figure is lower than that of the normal HbF concentration group. Conclusions: BM Test HbA1c revealed a high and positive correlation with high performance liquid chromatography and International Federation of Clinical Chemistry reference methods. However, the HbA1c values by BM Test HbA1c and high performance liquid chromatography method were lower than those by International Federation of Clinical Chemistry reference method when the HbF concentration was high. BM Test HbA1c had some deviation from the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry reference method, while no significant interference was seen when the HbF values were less than 15%. When HbF is higher than 15%, however, the interpretation of HbA1c by BM Test may require some special consideration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004563214568872

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enzymatic methods are widely used in centralized laboratories and rely on endoglycosidase digestion followed by quantification of released glycated amino acids.

    “In addition, although enzymatic methods are widely used in centralized laboratories and rely on endoglycosidase digestion followed by quantification of released glycated amino acids, no studies of enzymatic POC platforms met our inclusion criteria (42-44).”

    From Comparison of point‑of‑care HbA1c devices with laboratory HPLC methods: A systematic review and meta‑analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Conclusion (page unavailable) describes an enzymatic HbA1c method used with a high-throughput routine automated analyzer, but does not establish that enzymatic methods are widely used in centralized laboratories. The Discussion (page unavailable) describes endopeptidase cleavage that releases a glycated dipeptide, followed by its reaction with fructosyl peptide oxidase—not endoglycosidase digestion followed by quantification of released glycated amino acids. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hattori Y, Yamashiro Y, Fujimoto H, et al. The elution profiles of abnormal hemoglobins in HbA1c measurement by high performance liquid chromatography, and their interference with HbA1c analysis in Japan. Int Med J 2006; 13: 83-90.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nitta, T., Yamashiro, Y., Hattori, Y., Ezumi, T., Nishioka, M., & Nakamura, J.
Affiliations
  • Yamaguchi University (JP)
  • Yamaguchi University Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Nitta, Takenori
Venue
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Published
2015-01-13
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
569-575
ISSN
  • 0004-5632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1001
OpenAlex
W2170706508
Cited by
6
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
Keywords
HbA1c testing, fetal hemoglobin, enzyme activity assay, HPLC, hemoglobinopathies, HbA1c
MeSH terms
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Fetal Hemoglobin, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Reference Standards, Reproducibility of Results, Clinical Chemistry Tests, Enzyme Assays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review