Association between mode of delivery and postpartum depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Postpartum depression is one of the most common postpartum diseases, which has an important impact on the interaction between mother, infant, partner and family, as well as the long-term emotional and cognitive development of infants. However, there are still great disagreements on whether the delivery mode will affect the risk of postpartum depression. The purpose of this study is to explore whether the mode of delivery will affect the risk of postpartum depression through the comprehensive network meta-analysis of elective cesarean section, emergency cesarean section, instrumental vaginal delivery and spontaneous vaginal delivery. Methods: We searched in three electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Results: This paper included 43 studies with a total sample size of 1,827,456 participants. Direct meta-analysis showed that the odds ratio of postpartum depression risk was 1.33 (95% confidence interval = [1.21, 1.46]) between cesarean section and vaginal delivery. The odds ratios of high Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale score between cesarean section and vaginal delivery in the three postpartum periods (within 2 weeks, within half a year and over half a year) were basically the same. There was no difference between cesarean section and vaginal delivery in the risk of severe postpartum depression at the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale cut-off point ⩾13 (odds ratio = 1.07; 95% confidence interval = [0.99, 1.16]). Network meta-analysis showed that the risk of postpartum depression in the pairwise comparisons emergency cesarean section vs spontaneous vaginal delivery and elective cesarean section vs spontaneous vaginal delivery was odds ratio = 1.53 (95% confidence interval = [1.22, 1.91]) and 1.47 (95% confidence interval = [1.16, 1.86]). Conclusion: The mode of delivery has a significant effect on the occurrence of mild postpartum depression. Women who give birth by cesarean section, especially who give birth by emergency cesarean section, are at a higher risk of mild postpartum depression. We should carefully monitor the progress of postpartum mental disorders in women who delivered by cesarean section and make it possible for women to have a quick access to mental healthcare.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies indicate that mode of delivery may influence postpartum depression risk.
“Several studies indicate that mode of delivery may influence PPD risk.”
Recent meta-analyses show that women who give birth by cesarean section, especially emergency procedures, face a significantly higher risk of developing depressive symptoms compared with those who deliver vaginally.
“While findings can be controversial, recent meta-analyses show that women who give birth by cesarean section—especially emergency procedures—face a significantly higher risk of developing depressive symptoms compared to those who deliver vaginally.61–63”
Cites
Rates and risk of postpartum depression – a meta-analysis
O'hara, M. W., & Swain, A. M. (1996) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/09540269609037816 · Cited by 3,116 · see citing works
Sword, W., Kurtz Landy, C., Thabane, L., Watt, S., Krueger, P., Farine, D., & Foster, G. (2011) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02950.x · Cited by 157 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…still a considerable disagreement as to whether delivery patterns affect the risk of PPD, and many studies have not found an independent relationship between them (Carter et al., 2006; Eisenach et al., 2008; Hannah et al., 2002; Nielsen Forman et al., 2000; Patel et al., 2005; Sword et al., 2011).”
BackgroundChen, H., Lai, J. C., Hwang, S., Huang, N., Chou, Y., & Chien, L. (2017) · Birth · doi:10.1111/birt.12295 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fagan, J., Dufour, S., Duet, S., Downs, E., Siddaiah, H., Viswanath, O., Shekoohi, S., & Kaye, A. (2026) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s579920
- Authors
- Sun, L., Wang, S., & Li, X.-Q.
- Affiliations
- Jilin University (CN)
- Northeast Normal University (CN)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
- ORCID
- Venue
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-09-15
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 588-601
- ISSN
- 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1614
- OpenAlex
- W3087327372
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Keywords
- postpartum depression, mode of delivery, cesarean section, emergency cesarean section, vaginal delivery, instrumental delivery, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, postpartum mental health, risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, Infant, Pregnancy, Depression, Postpartum, Delivery, Obstetric, Postpartum Period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review