Cited by 10Psychiatric care and mental health servicesHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsMental Health and Patient Involvement

Outcomes of Victorian Prevention and Recovery Care Services: A matched pairs comparison

Open access
Farhall, John, Brophy, Lisa, Reece, John, Tibble, Holly, Le, Long Khanh-Dao, Mihalopoulos, Cathrine, Fletcher, Justine, Harvey, Carol +7 more·2021·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: In Victoria, Prevention and Recovery Care Services have been established to provide a partial alternative to inpatient admissions through short-term residential mental health care in the community. This study set out to determine whether Prevention and Recovery Care Services are achieving their objectives in relation to reducing service use and costs, fostering least restrictive care and leading to positive clinical outcomes. Methods: We matched 621 consumers whose index admission in 2014 was to a Prevention and Recovery Care (‘PARCS consumers’) with 621 similar consumers whose index admission in the same year was to an acute inpatient unit and who had no Prevention and Recovery Care stays for the study period (‘inpatient-only consumers’). We used routinely collected data to compare them on a range of outcomes. Results: Prevention and Recovery Care Services consumers made less subsequent use of acute inpatient services and, on balance, incurred costs that were similar to or lower than inpatient-only consumers. They were also less likely to spend time on an involuntary treatment order following their index admission. Prevention and Recovery Care Services consumers also experienced positive clinical outcomes over the course of their index admission, but the magnitude of this improvement was not as great as for inpatient-only consumers. This type of clinical improvement is important for Prevention and Recovery Care Services, but they may place greater emphasis on personal recovery as an outcome. Conclusion: Prevention and Recovery Care Services can provide an alternative, less restrictive care option for eligible consumers who might otherwise be admitted to an acute inpatient unit and do so at no greater cost.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004867420983473

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the year following a PARC service stay, consumers are significantly less likely to have an inpatient admission and less likely to be on a Community Treatment Order (CTO).

    “Outcomes of a matched pairs comparison between PARC and inpatient services found that in the year following a PARC service stay consumers are significantly less likely to have an inpatient admission and less likely to be on a Community Treatment Order (CTO) [23]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Department of Health and Human Services. (2019) Adult Mental Health Quarterly KPI Report (Revised). Melbourne: Victorian Government.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farhall, J., Brophy, L., Reece, J., Tibble, H., Le, L. K.-D., Mihalopoulos, C., Fletcher, J., Harvey, C., Morrisroe, E., Newton, R., Sutherland, G., Spittal, M. J., Meadows, G., Vine, R., & Pirkis, J.
Affiliations
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • ACAP University College (AU)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Peninsula Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Farhall, John
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2021-01-11
Volume
55
Issue
12
Pages
1178-1190
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W3119204904
Cited by
10
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1115907)
  • Australian Research Council (FT180100075)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
mental health costs, clinical outcomes, personal recovery, Victoria, Australia
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Hospitalization, Humans, Inpatients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review