The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Firms Mandate ISO 14001 Certification
Abstract
Thousands of facilities worldwide have certified to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14001, the international environmental management system standard, and previous research typically has studied these certification decisions at the facility level. However, significant anecdotal evidence indicates that firms may have a strong role, and if so, prior studies may be drawing inappropriate conclusions about the rationale for ISO 14001 certification. Drawing on institutional theory and the resource-based view of the firm, this study offers a conceptual framework that explains why parent companies would mandate—rather than simply encourage—their operational units to certify to ISO 14001. The framework is tested using survey data of corporate environmental managers. The results show that firms have a central role in nearly half of all facility-level certifications and that firms that mandate ISO 14001 endure greater external pressures and have stronger complementary resources and capabilities that support their organization-wide ISO 14001 policies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation
Grant, R. M. (1991) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166664 · Cited by 9,699
Strategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Cited by
Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training
Sarkis, J., Gonzalez‐Torre, P., & Adenso‐Diaz, B. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001 · Cited by 1,518
Green Innovation and Financial Performance: An Institutional Approach
Aguilera-Caracuel, J., & Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N. (2013) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026613507931 · Cited by 624
On the drivers of eco-innovation: empirical evidence from China
Cai, W.-G., & Zhou, X.-L. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.035 · Cited by 349
HRM institutional entrepreneurship for sustainable business organizations
Ren, S., & Jackson, S. E. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100691 · Cited by 175
Certifications and Reputation: Determining the Standard of Desirability Amidst Uncertainty
Graffin, S. D., & Ward, A. J. (2010) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0400 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Darnall, N.
- Venue
- Business & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 354-381
- ISSN
- 0007-6503 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4205
- OpenAlex
- W1986425440
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 20.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Firms Mandate ISO 14001 Certification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0007650306289387
- The paper
- Darnall, N. (2006). Why Firms Mandate ISO 14001 Certification. Business & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650306289387
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.