The impact of human resource management on corporate social performance strengths and concerns
Open accessAbstract
Although high-performance human resource practices do not directly affect corporate social performance (CSP) strengths, they do positively affect CSP strengths in companies that are highly innovative or have high levels of slack. High-performance human resource management (HRM) practices also directly and negatively affect CSP concerns. Drawing on the resource-based view and using secondary data from an objective, third-party database, the authors develop and test hypotheses about how high-performance HRM affects a company’s CSP strengths and concerns. Findings suggest that HRM and innovation are important capabilities because they create and enhance other capabilities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HRM practices impact not only employees but also the human, social, and environmental contexts of organizations.
“despite evidence that HRM practices impact not only employees but also the human, social, and environmental contexts of organizations (Renwick, Jabbour, Muller-Camen, Redman, & Wilkinson, 2016;Rothenberg, Hull, & Tang, 2017)”
From Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM? (2020) · cites this paper as Rothenberg, Hull, & Tang, 2017
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334 · see citing works
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020 · see citing works
Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources
Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.820 · Cited by 2,252 · see citing works
Corporate Social Performance As a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce
Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/000765030003900302 · Cited by 2,077 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM?
Aust, I., Matthews, B., & Muller-Camen, M. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100705 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rothenberg, S., Hull, C. E., & Tang, Z.
- Affiliations
- Saunders College of Business, Rochester, NY, USA
- Corresponding author
- Rothenberg, Sandra
- Venue
- Business & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-27
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 391-418
- ISSN
- 0007-6503 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4205
- OpenAlex
- W2250070951
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 10.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- philarchive.org
- Locations
- Business & Society (publishedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- SHRM Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Keywords
- human resource management, corporate social performance, innovation ability, slack resources, resource-based view, capability-based view, corporate social responsibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
