Cited by 75Computational and Text Analysis MethodsQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence Applications

Efficient, explicatory, and equitable: why qualitative researchers should embrace AI, but cautiously

Open access
Anis, Shafiullah, French, Juliana A.·2023·Business & Society

Abstract

Qualitative researchers, particularly those researching business and society topics, should embrace artificial intelligence (AI) to conduct efficient, explicatory, and equitable research but also exercise caution to avoid its pitfalls.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00076503231163286

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI serves to facilitate rather than replace research endeavours.

    “In navigating the ethical implications of qualitative research, researchers should take into consideration that AI serves to facilitate rather than replace research endeavours (Anis & French, 2023).”
  • AI can help researchers in analyzing vast amounts of data from patients' treatment charts, laboratory reports, and textual feedback from students, and extract relevant information needed for research followed by sorting out the data in a structured manner for statistical analysis.

    “AI can also help researchers in analyzing vast amounts of data from patients’ treatment charts, laboratory reports, and textual feedback from students, and extract the relevant information needed for the research followed by sorting out the data in a structured manner for statistical analysis [36,37].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anis, S., & French, J. A.
Affiliations
Monash University Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Anis, Shafiullah
Venue
Business & Society
Published
2023-03-28
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
1139-1144
ISSN
  • 0007-6503 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4205
OpenAlex
W4361212561
Cited by
75
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 4
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Business & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
artificial intelligence, qualitative research, research efficiency, research equity, research ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review