Evaluation and Comparison of a 1-Month Versus a 2-Week Community Pediatrics and Advocacy Rotation for Pediatric Residents
Abstract
This prospective study was conducted to assess the effects of a 4-week community pediatrics and advocacy rotation with a unique project (Curriculum A), a 2-week community pediatrics rotation with advocacy training and unique project throughout residency (Curriculum B), or no curriculum exposure on residents' attitudes, perceived competence, knowledge, and behaviors. A 27-item questionnaire was used to assess attitudes, competence, and knowledge. Examination of residents' patients' use of Early Intervention services during the 5-year period after curricula introduction assessed behaviors. Seventy percent of questionnaires distributed over several years were completed by 105 of 111 eligible residents. Residents exposed to Curriculum A or B demonstrated improved competence and knowledge but no significant increase in positive attitudes toward community pediatrics and advocacy. Residents' patients' use of Early Intervention services increased 65% during the 5-year period after curriculum introduction. No significant differences in outcome measures were observed between Curriculum A and Curriculum B.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of included pediatric curricula were published after 2001 and directly referenced the inclusion of child advocacy in the requirements as part of the rationale for their creation.
“the majority were published after and directly referenced the inclusion of child advocacy in the requirements as part of the rationale for their creation.”
From A Systematic Review of Advocacy Curricula in Graduate Medical Education (2019) · cites this paper as [32]
Cites
A Block Rotation in Community Pediatrics
Shope, T. R., Bradley, B. J., & Taras, H. L. (1999) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.104.s1.143 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Advocacy Training During Pediatric Residency
Lozano, P., Biggs, V. M., Sibley, B. J., Smith, T. M., Marcuse, E. K., & Bergman, A. B. (1994) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.94.4.532 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Systematic Review of Advocacy Curricula in Graduate Medical Education
Howell, B. A., Kristal, R. B., Whitmire, L. R., Gentry, M., Rabin, T. L., & Rosenbaum, J. (2019) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05184-3 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
The state of health advocacy training in postgraduate medical education: a scoping review
McDonald, M., Lavelle, C., Wen, M., Sherbino, J., & Hulme, J. (2019) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13929 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Lax, Y., Braganza, S., & Patel, M. (2019) · Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development · doi:10.1177/2382120519859300 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Off to a Jump Start: Using Immersive Activities to Integrate Continuity Clinic and Advocacy
Sieplinga, K., Disbrow, E., Triemstra, J., & van de Ridder, M. (2021) · Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development · doi:10.1177/23821205211059652 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- DeLago, C., & Gracely, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
- Drexel University (US)
- Corresponding author
- DeLago, Cynthia
- ORCID
- Gracely, Edward
- Venue
- Clinical Pediatrics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 821-830
- ISSN
- 0009-9228 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2707
- OpenAlex
- W2165978842
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
- Keywords
- community paediatrics, pediatric advocacy, early intervention services, resident attitudes, perceived competence
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Community Medicine, Curriculum, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Pediatrics, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Surveys and Questionnaires
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review