Cited by 39Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesGenomics and Rare Diseases

Delivering the diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy: experiences and preferences of parents and individuals

Jaramillo, Carolina, Nyquist, Christina, Riggan, Kirsten A., Egginton, Jason, Phelan, Sean, Allyse, Megan·2019·Clinical Pediatrics

Abstract

Increased prenatal diagnoses of sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) amid limited knowledge of their prognoses heighten the need to understand how families contend with the implications of an SCA. To explore the experiences of parents and individuals who received a genetic diagnosis of an SCA (excluding Turner syndrome), we conducted semistructured qualitative telephone interviews with 43 participants affected by these conditions. Parents (n = 35) and individuals (n = 8) expressed almost unanimous interest in more optimistic portrayals of their condition from their providers, even when the prognosis is uncertain. While some participants reported success in receiving accurate information from their provider and identifying supportive resources, numerous families received outdated or misleading information about their condition and lacked direction in accessing follow-up care and support. Parents desire greater coordination of their child's medical care and access to care that approaches an SCA holistically. Opportunities remain to improve the diagnosis and care of individuals with SCAs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0009922818817310

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several factors influence prospective parents' decision to continue or terminate a pregnancy with a TS fetus, including fetal ultrasound abnormalities, incidental findings, presence or absence of mosaicism, gestational age at diagnosis, parental age, number of previous children, possibility of infertility, parents' fear/anxiety, parents' socioeconomic status and religious background, ethnicity,遗传学

    “Several factors have been found to influence the prospective parents’ decision to continue or terminate a pregnancy with a TS fetus.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaramillo, C., Nyquist, C., Riggan, K. A., Egginton, J., Phelan, S., & Allyse, M.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Allyse, Megan
Venue
Clinical Pediatrics
Published
2018-12-05
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
336-342
ISSN
  • 0009-9228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2707
OpenAlex
W2903250190
Cited by
39
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
sex chromosome aneuploidy, prenatal diagnosis, genetic diagnosis, parental experiences, patient experience, provider communication, prognosis disclosure, health information accuracy, follow-up care, support resources, care coordination, Turner syndrome
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aneuploidy, Attitude to Health, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Interviews as Topic, Male, Parents, Young Adult, Sex Chromosome Disorders of Sex Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review