The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resource Wealth and Political Regimes in Africa
Abstract
Political economists point to the levels of economic development, poverty, and income inequality as the most important determinants of political regimes. The authors present empirical evidence suggesting a robust and negative correlation between the presence of a sizable natural resource sector and the level of democracy in Africa. They argue that resource abundance not only is an important determinant of democratic transition but also partially determines the success of democratic consolidation in Africa. The results illuminate the fact that post-Cold War democratic reforms have been successful only in resource-poor countries such as Benin, Mali, and Madagascar. The authors argue that resource-rich countries such as Nigeria and Gabon can become democratic only if they introduce strong mechanisms of vertical and horizontal accountability within the state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082979 · Cited by 6,840
Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804946 · Cited by 2,845
Jensen, N. M. (2003) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818303573040 · Cited by 1,017
Self-citation
Cited by
What Have We Learned about the Resource Curse?
Ross, M. L. (2015) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-052213-040359 · Cited by 1,146
Do natural resources fuel authoritarianism? A reappraisal of the resource curse
HABER, S., & MENALDO, V. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055410000584 · Cited by 1,128
The resource curse revisited and revised: A tale of paradoxes and red herrings
Brunnschweiler, C. N., & Bulte, E. H. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2007.08.004 · Cited by 1,121
Jensen, N. M. (2003) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818303573040 · Cited by 1,017
Self-citationCursing the Blessings? Natural Resource Abundance, Institutions, and Economic Growth
Brunnschweiler, C. N. (2008) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.004 · Cited by 710
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, N., & Wantchekon, L.
- Venue
- Comparative Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 816-841
- ISSN
- 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3829
- OpenAlex
- W2158766100
- Cited by
- 725
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resource Wealth and Political Regimes in Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0010414004266867
- The paper
- Jensen, N., & Wantchekon, L. (2004). Resource Wealth and Political Regimes in Africa. Comparative Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004266867
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.