The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building
Open accessAbstract
Effective deliberation is central to democracy and so should enter any definition of democratization. However, the deliberative aspect now ubiquitous in the theory, practice, and promotion of democracy is generally missing in comparative studies of democratization. Deliberation capacity can be distributed in variable ways in the deliberative systems of states and other polities. A framework is described for locating and analyzing the contributions of its components and so evaluating the degree to which a polity’s deliberative system is authentic, inclusive, and consequential. An emphasis on deliberation reveals important determinants of democratic transition and consolidation, thereby providing substantial explanatory as well as evaluative and normative purchase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-4175 · Cited by 12,693
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy
Habermas, J. (1996) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001 · Cited by 9,998
Social Choice and Individual Values.
Shackle, G. L. S., & Arrow, K. J. (1951) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2549613 · Cited by 7,792
Kuper, L., & Horowitz, D. L. (1986) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2069338 · Cited by 4,869
Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation
Linz, J. (1996) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.56021/9780801851575 · Cited by 3,583
Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-2995 · Cited by 3,574
Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America
Przeworski, A. (1991) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139172493 · Cited by 3,494
Coller, X., Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40184001 · Cited by 3,028
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3548 · Cited by 2,975
Elections Without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2002) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2002.0026 · Cited by 2,711
Cited by
Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Fish, S., Hicken, A., Kroenig, M., Lindberg, S. I., McMann, K., Paxton, P., et al. (2011) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592711000880 · Cited by 954
Bächtiger, A., Niemeyer, S., Neblo, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Steiner, J. (2010) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00342.x · Cited by 493
Coupling citizens and elites in deliberative systems: The role of institutional design
Hendriks, C. M. (2016) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12123 · Cited by 284
Schouten, G., Leroy, P., & Glasbergen, P. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.007 · Cited by 225
Protecting Democracy from Disinformation: Normative Threats and Policy Responses
Tenove, C. (2020) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161220918740 · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Dryzek, J. S.
- Venue
- Comparative Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-04-07
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1379-1402
- ISSN
- 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3829
- OpenAlex
- W2136746850
- Cited by
- 619
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 87.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0010414009332129
- The paper
- Dryzek, J. S. (2009). Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building. Comparative Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.