The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Informative Regress: Critical Antecedents in Comparative Politics
Abstract
How can political scientists best uncover historical causation without committing infinite regress? This article introduces a revised framework for historical analysis that can help systematically capture the deepest causal factors in political development. It improves on the familiar “critical juncture” framework by specifying the precise causal or noncausal status of the “antecedent conditions” preceding critical junctures. After disaggregating antecedent conditions into four logical types, the authors argue that scholars should be especially mindful of critical antecedents: factors or conditions preceding a critical juncture that combine in a causal sequence with factors operating during that juncture to produce divergent outcomes. Through analytic reviews of a wide array of major works, the authors illustrate how critical antecedents can clarify causal claims and enhance knowledge accumulation in comparative politics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994) · Princeton University Press · doi:10.1515/9781400821211 · Cited by 7,225
Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis
Pierson, P. (2004) · doi:10.1515/9781400841080 · Cited by 4,957
Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, R. D. (2007) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887100020852 · Cited by 2,410 · cited 1×
“We thus find Pierson’s stress on divergence more analytically useful than Cappoccia and Kelemen’s (2007) emphasis on contingency as the defining feature of critical junctures.”
BackgroundA Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research
Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (2006) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpj017 · Cited by 904
Luebbert, G. M. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195066104.001.0001 · Cited by 491
Strategies of Causal Assessment in Comparative Historical Analysis
Mahoney, J. (2003) · Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803963.011 · Cited by 260 · cited 1×
“Yet in a separate chapter, Mahoney (2003) looks before the Colliers’ critical juncture to identify what he calls “their main explanatory variable—the political strength of the oligarchy” (p. 359).”
Background
Cited by
Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia.
Slater, D. (2013) · ASEAN ECONOMIC BULLETIN · doi:10.1355/ae30-2h · Cited by 585
Self-citationTime Will Tell? Temporality and the Analysis of Causal Mechanisms and Processes
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2011) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414010390653 · Cited by 431
The Causal Logic of Critical Junctures
Soifer, H. D. (2012) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414012463902 · Cited by 409
The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond
Capoccia, G., & Ziblatt, D. (2010) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414010370431 · Cited by 403
Critical Event Analysis in Case Study Research
García-Montoya, L., & Mahoney, J. (2023) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124120926201 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Slater, D., & Simmons, E.
- Venue
- Comparative Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-03-02
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 886-917
- ISSN
- 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3829
- OpenAlex
- W2084426493
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 32.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Informative Regress: Critical Antecedents in Comparative Politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0010414010361343
- The paper
- Slater, D., & Simmons, E. (2010). Informative Regress: Critical Antecedents in Comparative Politics. Comparative Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010361343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.