The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond
Abstract
This article lays the theoretical and methodological foundations of a new historically minded approach to the comparative study of democratization, centered on the analysis of the creation, development, and interaction of democratic institutions. Historically, democracy did not emerge as a singular coherent whole but rather as a set of different institutions, which resulted from conflicts across multiple lines of social and political cleavage that took place at different moments in time. The theoretical advantage of this approach is illustrated by highlighting the range of new variables that come into focus in explaining democracy’s emergence. Rather than class being the single variable that explains how and why democracy came about, scholars can see how religious conflict, ethnic cleavages, and the diffusion of ideas played a much greater role in Europe’s democratization than has typically been appreciated. Above all, the authors argue that political parties were decisive players in how and why democracy emerged in Europe and should be at the center of future analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
Munger, M. C., & North, D. C. (1991) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1060065 · Cited by 24,871
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Pierson, P. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586011 · Cited by 8,094 · cited 3×
“Key episodes of reform and important critical junctures have lasting consequences in at least two senses: First, because they have the potential to entrench power relations that may outlast their social foundations, setting the parameters for future strategic interactions and thus influencing the possibility and the d…”
BackgroundDesigning Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994) · Princeton University Press · doi:10.1515/9781400821211 · Cited by 7,225
Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy
Lipset, S. M. (1959) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1951731 · Cited by 7,050
Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis
Pierson, P. (2004) · doi:10.1515/9781400841080 · Cited by 4,957
Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511510809 · Cited by 4,810
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance.
Schout, A., & North, D. C. (1991) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234910 · Cited by 4,775
(1962) · Excellence and Leadership in a Democracy · doi:10.7312/grau91070-013 · Cited by 3,317
Perception and Misperception in International Politics
Jervis, R. (2017) · doi:10.1515/9781400885114 · Cited by 3,199
Historical institutionalism in comparative politics
Thelen, K., & Steinmo, S. (1992) · Structuring Politics · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511528125.002 · Cited by 3,091
Cited by
Parties, Movements, and the Making of Democracy
Bermeo, N., & Yashar, D. J. (2016) · Parties, Movements, and Democracy in the Developing World · doi:10.1017/9781316661581.001 · Cited by 39
Women's Suffrage: Causes and Consequences
Teele, D. L. (2025) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-033123-125642 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Capoccia, G., & Ziblatt, D.
- Venue
- Comparative Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-06-28
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 8-9
- Pages
- 931-968
- ISSN
- 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3829
- OpenAlex
- W2154644194
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 108
- FWCI
- 73.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0010414010370431
- The paper
- Capoccia, G., & Ziblatt, D. (2010). The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond. Comparative Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010370431
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.