The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interest Group Success in the European Union: When (and Why) Does Business Lose?
Open accessAbstract
Business lobbying is widespread in the European Union (EU). But because not all lobbying is successful, the following question arises: When does business win and when does it lose in the context of legislative policy making in the EU? We argue that business actors are, overall, less successful than citizen groups in the European policy process. However, they can protect their interests if interest group conflict is low or the role of the European Parliament is restricted. A new data set on the positions of more than 1,000 non-state actors with respect to 70 legislative acts proposed by the European Commission between 2008 and 2010 allows us to evaluate this argument. Empirical support for our expectations is highly robust. Our findings have implications for the literature on legislative decision-making in the EU and for research on non-state actors in international organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790942 · Cited by 13,597
The Logic of Collective Action.
Golembiewski, R. T., & Olson, M. (1966) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091298 · Cited by 11,364
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
Kingdon, J. W. (1984) · Cited by 9,299
Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology
Weber, M. (2002) · Readings in Economic Sociology · doi:10.1002/9780470755679.ch3 · Cited by 6,867
Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (2014) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9780801471292 · Cited by 4,627
Dahl, R. A. (2007) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830020303 · Cited by 3,863
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952796 · Cited by 3,387
Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research
Skocpol, T. (1985) · Bringing the State Back In · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511628283.002 · Cited by 2,370
Politics : Who Gets What, When, How
Fromm, E., & Sozialforschung, I. F. (1937) · Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung · doi:10.5840/zfs193761185 · Cited by 1,909
Cited by
Are We All Amazon Primed? Consumers and the Politics of Platform Power
Culpepper, P. D., & Thelen, K. (2020) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414019852687 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Dür, A., Bernhagen, P., & Marshall, D.
- Venue
- Comparative Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-01-20
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 951-983
- ISSN
- 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3829
- OpenAlex
- W2159585853
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 111.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interest Group Success in the European Union: When (and Why) Does Business Lose? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0010414014565890
- The paper
- Dür, A., Bernhagen, P., & Marshall, D. (2015). Interest Group Success in the European Union: When (and Why) Does Business Lose? Comparative Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014565890
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.