The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Value Orientations From the World Values Survey: How Comparable Are They Cross-Nationally?
Abstract
We examine data from the World Values Survey regarding the existence of two consistent orientations in mass values, traditional versus secular/rational and survival versus self-expression. We also evaluate the empirical validity of Welzel’s revised value orientations: secular and emancipative. Over the years, a large body of work has presumed the stability and comparability of these value orientations across time and space. Our findings uncover little evidence of the existence of traditional–secular/rational or survival–self-expression values. Welzel’s two dimensions of value orientations—secular and emancipative—seem more reflective of latent value orientations in mass publics but are still imperfectly capturing these orientations. More importantly, these value orientations do not seem very comparable except among a small number of advanced post-industrial democracies. We call attention to the use of value measurements to explain important macro-level phenomena.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Inglehart’s dynamic concept is dimensionally reductionist”
From Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede With Inglehart (2018) · cites this paper as Aléman & Woods, 2016
Citations
Cites
Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance
Chen, F. F. (2007) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510701301834 · Cited by 12,217
Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124108314720 · Cited by 1,538
Do People Mean What They Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.2.67 · Cited by 1,391
Chen, F. F. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013193 · Cited by 962
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Abramson P. R., 2011, Paper prepared for the Global Cultural Changes Conference, Leuphana University
- Acock A. C., 2013, Discovering structural equation modeling using Stata
- 10.1017/S0003055401003100 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11205-010-9693-5 · DOI
- 10.1177/0010414005276666 · DOI
- Byrne B. M., 2008, Psicothema, 20, 872
- 10.1177/0022022102250225 · DOI
- 10.1177/0010414010371903 · DOI
- 10.1177/0192512114528228 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.009 · DOI
- 10.1093/pan/mpn014 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022022112438397 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137 · DOI
- 10.1093/poq/nfn035 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.090203.103000 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139600002.001 · DOI
- 10.1515/9780691214429 · DOI · Paper page
- Inglehart R., 2013, Comparative politics: The problem of equivalence, 61
- 10.1177/000312240006500103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511550362 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511790881 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1537592710001258 · DOI
- 10.1177/0192512110364736 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11127-010-9642-5 · DOI
- 10.1093/ijpor/edp037 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511804557 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511894862 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/pan/mpt014 · DOI
- 10.1086/267455 · DOI
- Przeworski A., 1970, The logic of comparative social inquiry
- 10.1177/0192512110382029 · DOI
- 10.1093/pan/mpr028 · DOI
- van Deth J. W., 2014, Freedom rising: Human empowerment and the quest for emancipation, 8, 369
- 10.1017/CBO9781139540919 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9781139600002.007 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede With Inglehart
Beugelsdijk, S., & Welzel, C. (2018) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022118798505 · Cited by 461
“…on the contrary, has been criticized for a flawed dimensional understanding of culture that reduces cross-national variation to two misspecified dimensions and for overestimating the generational replacement dynamic in cultural change (Aléman & Woods, 2016; Flanagan, 1987; Flanagan & Lee, 2003).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Alemán, J., & Woods, D.
- Affiliations
- Fordham University (US)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Woods, Dwayne
- Venue
- Comparative Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-08-20
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1039-1067
- ISSN
- 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3829
- OpenAlex
- W2224660120
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 13.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Comparative Political Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Development › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Keywords
- value orientations, World Values Survey, secular values, emancipative values, international comparability, value measurement, post-industrial democracies, mass public
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review