Cited by 106Cultural Differences and ValuesCulture, Economy, and Development StudiesReligion and Society Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Value Orientations From the World Values Survey: How Comparable Are They Cross-Nationally?

Alemán, José, Woods, Dwayne·2016·Comparative Political Studies

Abstract

We examine data from the World Values Survey regarding the existence of two consistent orientations in mass values, traditional versus secular/rational and survival versus self-expression. We also evaluate the empirical validity of Welzel’s revised value orientations: secular and emancipative. Over the years, a large body of work has presumed the stability and comparability of these value orientations across time and space. Our findings uncover little evidence of the existence of traditional–secular/rational or survival–self-expression values. Welzel’s two dimensions of value orientations—secular and emancipative—seem more reflective of latent value orientations in mass publics but are still imperfectly capturing these orientations. More importantly, these value orientations do not seem very comparable except among a small number of advanced post-industrial democracies. We call attention to the use of value measurements to explain important macro-level phenomena.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0010414015600458

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Abramson P. R., 2011, Paper prepared for the Global Cultural Changes Conference, Leuphana University
  2. Acock A. C., 2013, Discovering structural equation modeling using Stata
  3. 10.1017/S0003055401003100 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s11205-010-9693-5 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/0010414005276666 · DOI
  6. Byrne B. M., 2008, Psicothema, 20, 872
  7. 10.1177/0022022102250225 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/0010414010371903 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/0192512114528228 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.009 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/pan/mpn014 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/0022022112438397 · DOI
  13. 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/poq/nfn035 · DOI
  15. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.090203.103000 · DOI
  16. 10.1017/CBO9781139600002.001 · DOI
  17. 10.1515/9780691214429 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Inglehart R., 2013, Comparative politics: The problem of equivalence, 61
  19. 10.1177/000312240006500103 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1017/CBO9780511550362 · DOI
  21. 10.1017/CBO9780511790881 · DOI
  22. 10.1017/S1537592710001258 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/0192512110364736 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s11127-010-9642-5 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/ijpor/edp037 · DOI
  26. 10.1017/CBO9780511804557 · DOI
  27. 10.1017/CBO9780511894862 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1093/pan/mpt014 · DOI
  29. 10.1086/267455 · DOI
  30. Przeworski A., 1970, The logic of comparative social inquiry
  31. 10.1177/0192512110382029 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/pan/mpr028 · DOI
  33. van Deth J. W., 2014, Freedom rising: Human empowerment and the quest for emancipation, 8, 369
  34. 10.1017/CBO9781139540919 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1017/CBO9781139600002.007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 106

Metadata

Authors
Alemán, J., & Woods, D.
Affiliations
  • Fordham University (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Woods, Dwayne
Venue
Comparative Political Studies
Published
2015-08-20
Volume
49
Issue
8
Pages
1039-1067
ISSN
  • 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3829
OpenAlex
W2224660120
Cited by
106
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
13.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Comparative Political Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Development › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
value orientations, World Values Survey, secular values, emancipative values, international comparability, value measurement, post-industrial democracies, mass public

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review