Cited by 344International Relations and Foreign PolicyGlobal Security and Public HealthGlobal Peace and Security Dynamics

Ontological security, self-articulation and the securitization of identity

Browning, Christopher S, Joenniemi, Pertti·2017·Cooperation and Conflict

Abstract

The concept of ontological security has made increasing headway within International Relations, in particular through its ability to offer alternative explanations of the forces underpinning security dilemmas and conflict in world politics. While welcoming the insights already provided by its application, this article argues that the concept’s use to date has been too much geared to questions of identity-related stability, with change viewed as disturbing and anxiety-inducing. In contrast, the article calls for a more open understanding that: (i) links ontological security to reflexivity and avoids collapsing together the concepts of self, identity and ontological security; (ii) avoids privileging securitization over desecuritization as a means for generating ontological security; and (iii) opens out the concept beyond a narrow concern with questions of conflict and the conduct of violence more towards the theorization of positive change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0010836716653161

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Browning, Christopher S. and Pertti Joenniemi (2015b) 'Identity Troubles: Vicarious Identity and the Generation of Self-Esteem and Ontological Security', paper presented at the ISPP conference, San Diego, 3-6 July 2015.
  2. Campbell, David (1998) Writing Security (2 nd edn) (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
  3. Edkins, Jenny (2003) 'Security, cosmology, Copenhagen', Contemporary Politics 9(4), pp.361-70.
  4. Rumelili, Bahar (ed.) (2015b), Conflict Resolution and Ontological Security: Peace Anxieties (New York: Routledge).
  5. Rumelili, Bahar (forthcoming) 'Identity and desecuritization: the pitfalls of conflating ontological and physical security', Journal of International Relations and Development .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Browning, C. S., & Joenniemi, P.
Affiliations
University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Browning, Christopher S
Venue
Cooperation and Conflict
Published
2016-07-11
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
31-47
ISSN
  • 0010-8367 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3691
OpenAlex
W2466597353
Cited by
344
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
92.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cooperation and Conflict (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Global Security and Public Health
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Keywords
ontological security, securitization, desecuritization, identity, reflexivity, self-articulation, security dilemma, positive change, identity stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review