The DOI matches its Crossref record.
I also Said, "White Racial Identity Influences White Researchers"
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scholars including Helms have encouraged (white) researchers to undertake identity work for decades, and numerous papers in recent years have outlined steps for greater researcher reflexivity on race, racism, and whiteness.
“Scholars including Helms have encouraged (white) researchers to undertake this type of identity work for decades (Helms, 1993), and numerous papers in recent years have outlined steps for greater researcher reflexivity on race, racism, and whiteness (Boykin et al., 2020; Dottolo & Kaschak, 2015; Spanierman et al., 2017).”
From Studying Ethnic-Racial Identity among White Youth: White Supremacy as a Developmental Context (2022) · cites this paper as Helms, 1993
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hardiman, R. (1982). White identity development: A process oriented model for describing the racial consciousness of White Americans. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
- 10.1177/0011000084124013 · DOI · Paper page
- Helms, J. E., 1990, Black and White racial identity: Theory, research, and practice
- Helms, J. E., 1992, A race is a nice thing to have: A guide to being a White person or understanding the White persons in your life
- 10.1177/0011000093212001 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Studying Ethnic-Racial Identity among White Youth: White Supremacy as a Developmental Context
Moffitt, U., & Rogers, L. O. (2022) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12762 · Cited by 81
“Scholars including Helms have encouraged (white) researchers to undertake this type of identity work for decades (Helms, 1993), and numerous papers in recent years have outlined steps for greater researcher reflexivity on race, racism, and whiteness (Boykin et al., 2020; Dottolo & Kaschak, 2015;…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Helms, J. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Helms, Janet E.
- ORCID
- Helms, Janet E.
- Venue
- The Counseling Psychologist
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 240-243
- ISSN
- 0011-0000 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3861
- OpenAlex
- W2102101362
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Counseling Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Keywords
- white identity, white researchers, racial identity, whiteness, researcher self-awareness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review