Cited by 205Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyCounseling Practices and Supervision

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

White Racial Identity Models: A Critique and Alternative Proposal

Open access
Rowe, Wayne, Bennett, Sandra K., Atkinson, Donald R.·1994·The Counseling Psychologist

Abstract

Existing models of White racial identity development (WRID) are challenged as being deficient in terms of: (a) being based on the oppression-adaptive models of minority identity development, (b) focusing primarily on attitudes toward racial/ethnic out-groups, not on White identity attitudes; and (c) depicting the process as developmental in nature. An alternative conceptualization, based on the construct of White racial consciousness, is presented as a more parsimonious explanation for the role of racially oriented attitudes. Three types of unachieved White racial consciousness (avoidant, dependent, and dissonant) are proposed along with four types of achieved White racial consciousness (dominative, conflictive, reactive, and integrative). Changes in attitudes characteristic of one type to those more representative of another are explained in terms of dissonance reduction. Information is provided regarding the availability of an assessment device designed to identify the types of White racial consciousness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0011000094221009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1177/0011000083113009 · DOI
  2. Atkinson, D. R., 1989, Counseling American minorities: A cross-cultural perspective
  3. Bennett, S. K., 1992, The Oklahoma Racial Attitudes Scale
  4. Bennett, E. K., meeting of the American Psychological Association
  5. 10.1177/0011000084121010 · DOI
  6. Carter, R. T., 1990, Black and White racial identity: Theory, research, and practice, 105
  7. Cross, W. E., 1971, Black World, 20, 13
  8. 10.1177/009579847800500102 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/BF00116172 · DOI
  10. Gaertner, S. L., 1986, Prejudice, discrimination and racism, 61
  11. Hardiman, R. (1982). White identity development: A process model for describing the racial consciousness of White Americans. Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 104A. (University Microfilms No. 82-10330)
  12. 10.1177/0011000084124013 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1177/0011000089172002 · DOI
  14. Helms, J. E., 1990, Black and White racial identity: Theory, research, and practice
  15. Helms, J. E., 1990, Black and White racial identity: Theory, research, and practice, 49
  16. Helms, J. E., 1990, Black and White racial identity: Theory, research, and practice, 66
  17. Highlen, P. S., meeting of the American Psychological Association
  18. Holland, J. L., 1992, Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personality and work environments
  19. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.893 · DOI
  20. Marcia, J. E., 1980, Handbook of adolescent psychology, 159
  21. McConahay, J. B., 1986, Prejudice, discrimination, and racism, 91
  22. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1976.tb02493.x · DOI
  23. 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb01561.x · DOI
  24. 10.1177/0011000089172001 · DOI
  25. 10.1037/0022-0167.28.3.250 · DOI
  26. 10.1037/0022-0167.32.3.431 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/0272431689091004 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/j.2161-1912.1988.tb00405.x · DOI
  29. Ponterotto, J. G., 1991, Handbook of racial/ethnic minority counseling research
  30. 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1990.tb01477.x · DOI
  31. 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb01580.x · DOI
  32. 10.1002/j.2161-1912.1990.tb00434.x · DOI
  33. 10.1177/0011000091191007 · DOI
  34. Sodowsky, G. R., meeting of the American Psychological Association
  35. Sue, D. W., 1990, Counseling the culturally different: Theory and practice
  36. 10.1037/0022-0167.38.3.296 · DOI
  37. Tokar, D. M., meetings of the American Psychological Association
  38. 10.1300/J082v17n01_02 · DOI
  39. 10.2307/1389115 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Rowe, W., Bennett, S. K., & Atkinson, D. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
The Counseling Psychologist
Published
1994-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
129-146
ISSN
  • 0011-0000 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3861
OpenAlex
W2565548825
Cited by
205
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
20.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Counseling Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
white identity, racial identity development, white privilege, racial attitudes, dissonance reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review