The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multicultural Training: Reexamination, Operationalization, and Integration
Abstract
The Multicultural Program Development Pyramid is a five-tiered framework outlining stages of multicultural counseling training (MCT) program development. The pyramid is intended to serve as a guide to help program developers formulate their own unique MCT programs. The pyramid lays out a path of critical choice points in MCT development, beginning with the generation of an explicit philosophy of training and proceeding through the stages of identifying training objectives, selecting instructional strategies, choosing from among several proposed program designs, and evaluating the program. Use of the pyramid encourages the critical examination of a full range of choices at each stage. Implications of the pyramid for current MCT, the scientist-practitioner model, and the future of MCT research and development are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kushner (2021) · doi:10.12788/jfp · Cited by 3,799
Toward a Theoretical Explanation of the Effects of Race on Counseling A Black and White Model
Helms, J. E. (1984) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000084124013 · Cited by 575
Cited by
The Case for Cultural Competency in Psychotherapeutic Interventions
Sue, S., Zane, N., Nagayama Hall, G. C., & Berger, L. K. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163651 · Cited by 662
Stigma and disclosure: Implications for coming out of the closet
CORRIGAN, P., & MATTHEWS, A. (2003) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/0963823031000118221 · Cited by 468
Constantine, M. G., & Ladany, N. (2000) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0167.47.2.155 · Cited by 324
Foundations of multicultural psychology: Research to inform effective practice.
Smith, T. B., & Trimble, J. E. (2016) · doi:10.1037/14733-000 · Cited by 132
Houston, 2001: Context and Legacy
Fouad, N. A., McPherson, R. H., Gerstein, L., Blustein, D. L., Elman, N., Helledy, K. I., & Metz, A. J. (2004) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000003259943 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Ridley, C. R., Mendoza, D. W., & Kanitz, B. E.
- Venue
- The Counseling Psychologist
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 227-289
- ISSN
- 0011-0000 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3861
- OpenAlex
- W2113061547
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicultural Training: Reexamination, Operationalization, and Integration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0011000094222001
- The paper
- Ridley, C. R., Mendoza, D. W., & Kanitz, B. E. (1994). Multicultural Training: Reexamination, Operationalization, and Integration. The Counseling Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000094222001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
