CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,884Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Guide to Conducting Consensual Qualitative Research

Hill, Clara E., Thompson, Barbara J., Williams, Elizabeth Nutt·1997·The Counseling Psychologist
DOI 10.1177/0011000097254001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The authors discuss the components of consensual qualitative research (CQR) using open-ended questions to gather data, using words to describe phenomena, studying a few cases intensively, recognizing the importance of context, using an inductive analytic process, using a team and making decisions by consensus, using auditors, and verifying results by systematically checking against the raw data. The three steps for conducting CQR are developing and coding domains, constructing core ideas, and developing categories to describe consistencies across cases (cross analysis). Criteria for evaluating CQR are trustworthiness of the method, coherence of the results, representativeness of the results to the sample, testimonial validity, applicability of the results, and replicability across samples. Finally, the authors discuss implications for research, practice, and training.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0011000097254001

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Belenky, M. F., 1986, Women's ways of knowing: The development of self
  2. Elliott, R., 1989, Entering the circle: Hermaneutic investigation in psychology
  3. Elliott, R., 1993, Comprehensive process analysis: Mapping the change process in psychotherapy
  4. Gadamer, H. G., 1979, Truth and method
  5. Glaser, B., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research
  6. Glass, A. L., 1986, Cognition
  7. Hamilton, D., 1994, Handbook of qualitative research, 60
  8. Harding, S., 1991, Whose science? Whose knowkdge? Thinking from Women's Lives
  9. Hayes, J. A., annual convention of the American Psychological Association
  10. Highlen, P. S., 1996, The psychology research handbook
  11. Hill, C. E., annual convention of the American Psychological Association
  12. Ladany, N., 1997, Journal of Counseling Psychology
  13. Petersen, D., 1997, A qualitative study of unresolved misunderstandings in longterm psychotherapy
  14. Richardson, L, 1994, Handbook of qualitative research, 516
  15. Thompson, B. J., 1997, Misunderstanding events from the perspective of therapists and clients
  16. Williams, E. N., 1997, Journal of Counseling Psychology
  17. Williams, E. N., 1997, Perceptions of serendipity: Career paths of prominent women in counseling psychology

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,008

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland,
  • American Day Behavioral Health Care System, Inc.
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Hill, Clara E.
ORCID
Venue
The Counseling Psychologist
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1997-10
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
517-572
ISSN
  • 0011-0000 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3861
DOI
10.1177/0011000097254001
OpenAlex
W2169110538
Cited by
2,884
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 119 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 121 · 2023: 132 · 2022: 171 · 2021: 161 · 2020: 172 · 2019: 162 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 133 · 2016: 143 · 2015: 146 · 2014: 157 · 2013: 150 · 2012: 131
FWCI
107.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
The Counseling Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Keywords
consensual qualitative research, consensus building, trustworthiness, replicability, cross-case analysis, core ideas, qualitative research methodology, counseling research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review