The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visibility: A Category for the Social Sciences
Abstract
Can visibility be counted as a general category for the social sciences? The attempt to provide an answer to this question entails both describing actual phenomena of visibility, and defining the characteristics of visibility as a workable, unified category. This article analyses the relational, strategic and processual aspects of visibility as constituting a single field. The importance of this field is rooted in the deep epistemology of seeing present in our society, as well as in its ratio vis-a-vis the other human sensory dimensions and extensions. At the substantive level, the article addresses the question of the ambivalences of visibility and its effects, according to social places and subjects. Recognition and control are understood and explained as two opposing outcomes of visibility. It is argued that empowerment does not rest univocally either with visibility (as it is assumed by the tradition of recognition) or with invisibility (as it is assumed by the arcana imperii tradition).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema
Mulvey, L. (1975) · Screen · doi:10.1093/screen/16.3.6 · Cited by 8,680
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001 · Cited by 6,188
Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. (2000) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1080/00071310020015280 · Cited by 2,244
Cited by
“Sharenting,” parent blogging, and the boundaries of the digital self
Blum-Ross, A., & Livingstone, S. (2017) · Popular Communication · doi:10.1080/15405702.2016.1223300 · Cited by 418
On territorology: towards a general science of territory
Brighenti, A. M. (2010) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276409350357 · Cited by 239
Self-citationThe visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles
Hesselmann, F., Graf, V., Schmidt, M., & Reinhart, M. (2017) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392116663807 · Cited by 153
Lifting the curtain: Strategic visibility of human labour in AI-as-a-Service
Newlands, G. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211016026 · Cited by 66
Disjointed knowledges, obfuscated visibility. Border controls at the French-Italian Alpine border
Tazzioli, M. (2020) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102155 · Cited by 46
Seeing infrastructure: race, facial recognition and the politics of data
Stevens, N., & Keyes, O. (2021) · Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/09502386.2021.1895252 · Cited by 41
Sculpting digital voids: The politics of forgetting on Facebook
Jacobsen, B. N. (2021) · Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/1354856520907390 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Brighenti, A.
- Venue
- Current Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 323-342
- ISSN
- 0011-3921 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7064
- OpenAlex
- W2087961159
- Cited by
- 675
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 27.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.