The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Introduction: Professions and organizations - a conceptual framework
Abstract
This collection seeks to reconnect two separate streams of work on professional organizations and professional occupations. In particular the articles collected here identify two key themes: (1) the challenges and opportunities that professional organizations pose for established and emerging professionalization projects and (2) the extent to which professional organizations create, institutionalize and manipulate new forms of professionalism and models of professionalization. To this effect, this collection brings together a number of articles from a broad range of disciplines (sociology, management, healthcare, accountancy, law and geography), theoretical backgrounds and national contexts which explore the complex connections between professional occupations and organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
Abbott, A. (1988) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001 · Cited by 7,733
The Appeal to ‘Professionalism’ as a Disciplinary Mechanism
Fournier, V. (1999) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/1467-954x.00173 · Cited by 779
Career as a Project of the Self and Labour Process Discipline
Grey, C. (1994) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038594028002007 · Cited by 583
Cited by
Heusinkveld, S., Gabbioneta, C., Werr, A., & Sturdy, A. (2018) · Journal of Professions and Organization · doi:10.1093/jpo/joy015 · Cited by 44
Changing policy and practice: Making sense of national guidelines for osteoarthritis
Ong, B. N., Morden, A., Brooks, L., Porcheret, M., Edwards, J. J., Sanders, T., Jinks, C., & Dziedzic, K. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.036 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Muzio, D., & Kirkpatrick, I.
- Venue
- Current Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-06-29
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 389-405
- ISSN
- 0011-3921 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7064
- OpenAlex
- W2146283661
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 31.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
