The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities
Abstract
Sociologists interested in professional work and occupations have differentiated professionalism as a distinctive and special way of controlling and organizing work and workers, with real advantages for both practitioners and clients. In this interpretation the analysis of professionalism is as an ‘occupational value’. But professionalism is changing and being changed as professionals now increasingly work in large-scale organizational workplaces and sometimes in international firms. This article explains professionalism as an occupational value and indicates both the changes to and continuities in professionalism in these organizational contexts. Then some of the possible consequences of the redefinition of professionalism are examined for practitioner-workers and their clients in public sector service work such as health, welfare and education. These consequences include changes in the work itself, in practitioner—employer and practitioner—client relations, and in the control of work priorities and processes. The final section considers if there might also be some advantages in the combination of professional and organizational logics for controlling work and workers and whether there are opportunities associated with these changes which might improve both the conduct and practice of professional service work, while being of benefit to practitioners and clients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
Abbott, A. (1988) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001 · Cited by 7,733
The Appeal to ‘Professionalism’ as a Disciplinary Mechanism
Fournier, V. (1999) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/1467-954x.00173 · Cited by 779
Cited by
Teacher professionalism: why are we still talking about it?
Sachs, J. (2016) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1082732 · Cited by 509
Heusinkveld, S., Gabbioneta, C., Werr, A., & Sturdy, A. (2018) · Journal of Professions and Organization · doi:10.1093/jpo/joy015 · Cited by 44
Changing Occupational Roles in Audit Society—The Case of Swedish Student Aid Officials
Bruhn, A. (2015) · Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies · doi:10.19154/njwls.v5i1.4764 · Cited by 19
Harding, R., Maguire, L., & Williams, E. (2024) · International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice · doi:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2023.100646 · Cited by 12
Holloway, J., & Lewis, S. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517221137553 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Evetts, J.
- Venue
- Current Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-06-29
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 406-422
- ISSN
- 0011-3921 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7064
- OpenAlex
- W2120646341
- Cited by
- 837
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 57.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.