Addressing domestic violence in Canada and the United States: The uneasy co-habitation of women and the state
Abstract
Feminist sociologists and activists have drawn attention to how violence against women is linked to structural and cultural factors that subordinate women, mainly intersecting inequalities and limited rights. Mobilization by the Battered Women’s and Anti-Violence Movements, media attention, legislation, and policy have increased awareness and support to address violence against women. However, activists and researchers have also critiqued the problems with invoking the power of the state. The authors interrogate the role of the state in addressing domestic violence, especially in the context of immigration in the neoliberal era. More specifically, they examine how domestic violence, as legal and policy discourse, has been framed in Canada and the US, and the resulting forms of intervention. Through a critical literature review the authors show how this framing impacts immigrant and racialized women facing domestic violence. The article highlights problems and gaps in the respective discourses, as well as indicates possibilities for change.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 29,585 · see citing works
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445 · see citing works
Salcido, O., & Adelman, M. (2004) · Human Organization · doi:10.17730/humo.63.2.v5w7812lpxextpbw · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An intersectional analysis of the feminization of homelessness and mothers’ housing precarity
Bullock, H. E., Reppond, H. A., Truong, S. V., & Singh, M. R. (2020) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12406 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Morton, M., Samardzic, T., Cross, P., Johnstone, S., Vesely, L., & Choubak, M. (2021) · Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law · doi:10.1080/09649069.2021.1917711 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
George, P., Medhekar, A., Chaze, F., Osborne, B., van Heer, M., & Alavi, H. (2022) · Family Court Review · doi:10.1111/fcre.12653 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Abraham, M., & Tastsoglou, E.
- Affiliations
- Hofstra University (US)
- Saint Mary's University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Tastsoglou, Evangelia
- Venue
- Current Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-04-13
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 568-585
- ISSN
- 0011-3921 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7064
- OpenAlex
- W2339052077
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 10.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Violence, Rights in Latin America
- Keywords
- domestic violence, violence against women, state intervention, feminist activism, battered women's movement, anti-violence movement, immigration, neoliberalism, racialized women, immigrant women, policy framing, Canada, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review