Cited by 143Critical Race Theory in EducationEducational Leadership and PracticesTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

The 20th-Year Anniversary of Critical Race Theory in Education: Implications for Leading to Eliminate Racism

Capper, Colleen A.·2015·Educational Administration Quarterly

Abstract

Purpose: Though the first published application of critical race theory (CRT) to education occurred 20 years ago, implications of CRT for educational leadership did not occur until López conducted a CRT analysis of the politics of education literature in 2003. No publications explicitly identify the implications of CRT for leadership practice. Given the gap in the literature, the research question that anchors this article asks, “How can CRT inform educational leadership to eliminate racism?” Research Method: To address the research question, I conducted a literature analysis of CRT in educational leadership, identified the CRT tenets that guided each publication, and derived six primary, interrelated CRT tenets from this analysis. I also extracted from the publications explicit and implicit implications for leadership practice as these implications related directly to each of the six CRT tenets. Findings/Implications: I describe each of the CRT tenets and explain how each can inform educational leadership practice. To close the article, I propose a CRT Inventory for Leading to Eliminate Racism. The Inventory suggests questions to guide leadership practice for each of the CRT tenets. I also offer implications for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0013161x15607616

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intersectionality refers to how race, sexuality, identity, gender, neurodiversity, and socio-economic status interconnect and consequently have a greater impact on the life of an individual or group.

    “Finally, an important consideration in most educational contexts is Tenet 6: Inter -sectionality, which refers to how race, sexuality, identity, gender, neurodiversity, and socio-economic status interconnect and consequently have a greater impact on the life of an individual or group of individuals.”
  • Capper's (2015) review of critical race theory led to six interrelated tenets of education leadership, three of which support understanding the transformative approach: counter storytelling and majoritarian narratives, interest convergence, and intersectionality.

    “Moreover, Leithwood (2021) discussed Capper's (2015) review of critical race theory (CRT), which led to six interrelated tenets of education leadership, three of which support understanding the transformative approach: 'Tenet 3: Counter storytelling and majoritarian narratives,' 'Tenet 4: Interest convergence,' and 'Tenet 6: Intersectionality' (Leithwood, 2021, p. 27).”
  • Alignment between goals to improve education for minoritized and White students would help foster an acceptance of slow, incremental equity gains.

    “Through Tenet 4, Capper (2015) explained how alignment between goals to improve education for minoritized and White students would help 'foster an acceptance of slow, incremental equity gains' (p. 815); thus manipulating the education system for the better by implementing change that is beneficial to all students, where previous practice may only have benefited White students.”
  • Counternarratives present the perspective of the non-White group in depicting history and issues of racism, while majoritarian narratives serve to maintain White privilege or the status quo by reframing stories of racial inequities.

    “Capper (2015) compared counternarratives with majoritarian narratives as the former presenting the perspective of the non-White group in depicting history and issues of racism, while the latter serves to maintain White privilege, or the status quo, by reframing stories of racial inequities.”
  • Attention to interconnectedness, intersectionality, adaptability, respect, and responsibility will lead to transformative education leadership practices.

    “In addition to these practices, attention to interconnectedness, intersectionality, adaptability, respect, and responsibility will lead to transformative education leadership practices (Capper, 2015; Wane et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Capper, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Capper, Colleen A.
Venue
Educational Administration Quarterly
Published
2015-10-13
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
791-833
ISSN
  • 0013-161X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3519
OpenAlex
W2296843464
Cited by
143
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
25.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Administration Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
critical race theory, educational leadership, racism in education, leadership practices, politics of education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review