Cited by 1,132Critical Race Theory in EducationCareer Development and DiversityRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Critical race theory, race and gender microaggressions, and the experience of Chicana and Chicano scholars

Solorzano, Daniel G.·1998·International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Abstract

Using critical race theory as a framework, this article provides an examination of how racial and gender microaggressions affect the career paths of Chicana and Chicano scholars. This paper reports on open-ended survey and interview data of a purposive sample of six Chicana and six Chicano Ford Foundation Predoctoral, Dissertation, and Postdoctoral Minority Fellows. There are three objectives for this study: (a) to extend and apply a critical race theory to the field of education, (b) to ''recognize,'' ''document,'' and analyze racial and gender microaggressions of Chicana and Chicano scholars, and (c) to ''hear'' the voice of ''discrimination's victims'' by examining the effect of race and gender microaggressions on the lives of Chicana and Chicano scholars. Three patterns of racial and gender microaggressions were found: (a) scholars who felt out of place in the academy because of their race and or gender, (b) scholars who felt their teachers professors had lower expectations for them, and (c) scholars' accounts of subtle and not so subtle racial and gender incidents. The article ends with possible directions for continued critical race theory research with scholars of color.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/095183998236926

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Critical race theory scholars challenge traditional claims by the education system to objectivity, neutrality, meritocracy, and equal opportunity.

    “CRT scholars challenge the traditional claims by the education system to objectivity, neutrality, meritocracy, and equal opportunity (Solorzano, 1998).”
  • White faculty and students project stereotypes and misconceptions onto students of color, often oblivious to the harm caused.

    “White faculty and students project stereotypes and misconceptions onto students of color, often oblivious to the harm caused by their assumptions.”
  • Black students often struggle against the presumption that they are not serious or hard-working.

    “Black students often struggle against the presumption that they are not serious or hard-working (Solorzano et al., 2000;Davis et al., 2004;Solorzano, 1998).”
  • In education, critical race theory recognizes racism as central, permanent, and endemic to explaining individual experience in higher education.

    “In education, the epistemological foundations of CRT include the recognition that racism is central, permanent, and endemic to explaining individual experience in higher education.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solorzano, D. G.
Venue
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
Published
1998-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
121-136
ISSN
  • 0951-8398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5898
OpenAlex
W2087703491
Cited by
1,132
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 44
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
critical race theory, racial microaggressions, gender microaggressions, minority faculty, academic careers, teacher expectations, discrimination in higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review