The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organizational Climate, School Health, and Effectiveness: A Comparative Analysis
Abstract
The theory-driven Organizational Health Inventory (OHI) was compared to the empirically derived Organizational Climate Description Questionnaire (OCDQ-RS) in predicting student achievement and teachers' commitment to the school. After controlling for the socioeconomic status of the 58 secondary schools in the sample, only academic emphasis, a subtest of the OHI, made a significant contribution to student achievement. While both instruments predicted commitment, the OHI explained more of the variance. The findings suggest that, at best, the influence of the principal is indirect on school achievement but direct on commitment. Further application of both the OHI and OCDQ-RS is recommended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x08321509 · Cited by 2,549
The walls speak: the interplay of quality facilities, school climate, and student achievement
Uline, C., & Tschannen‐Moran, M. (2008) · Journal of Educational Administration · doi:10.1108/09578230810849817 · Cited by 420
Rice, J. K. (2001) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00131610121969352 · Cited by 93
Organizational learning and climate as predictors of self-efficacy
Tobin, T. J., Muller, R. O., & Turner, L. M. (2006) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-005-4790-z · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Bliss, J. R.
- Venue
- Educational Administration Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1990-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 260-279
- ISSN
- 0013-161X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3519
- OpenAlex
- W2066075566
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
