Cited by 139Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMultidisciplinary Science and Engineering Research

A Note on the Interpretation of Weighted Kappa and its Relations to Other Rater Agreement Statistics for Metric Scales

Schuster, Christof·2004·Educational and Psychological Measurement

Abstract

This article presents a formula for weighted kappa in terms of rater means, rater variances, and the rater covariance that is particularly helpful in emphasizing that weighted kappa is an absolute agreement measure in the sense that it is sensitive to differences in rater’s marginal distributions. Specifically, rater mean differences will decrease the value of weighted kappa relative to the value of the intraclass correlation that ignores mean differences. In addition, if rater variances also differ, then the value of weighted kappa will be decreased relative to the value of the product-moment correlation. Equality constraints on the rater means and variances are given to illustrate the relationships between weighted kappa, the intraclass correlation, and the product-moment correlation. In addition, the expression for weighted kappa shows that weighted kappa belongs to the Zegers-ten Berge family of chance-corrected association coefficients. More specifically, weighted kappa is equivalent to the chance-corrected identity coefficient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0013164403260197

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cohen's quadratically weighted kappa equals Lin's concordance correlation coefficient.

    “Furthermore, this kappa coefficient equals Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (Andres & Hernandez, 2020;Carrasco, 2010;King & Chinchilli, 2001;Kvålseth, 2018;Schuster, 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schuster, C.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Schuster, Christof
Venue
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Published
2004-04
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
243-253
ISSN
  • 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3888
OpenAlex
W1979317641
Cited by
139
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Multidisciplinary Science and Engineering Research
Keywords
weighted kappa, rater agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient, product moment correlation, metric scale, inter-rater reliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review