A Note on the Interpretation of Weighted Kappa and its Relations to Other Rater Agreement Statistics for Metric Scales
Abstract
This article presents a formula for weighted kappa in terms of rater means, rater variances, and the rater covariance that is particularly helpful in emphasizing that weighted kappa is an absolute agreement measure in the sense that it is sensitive to differences in rater’s marginal distributions. Specifically, rater mean differences will decrease the value of weighted kappa relative to the value of the intraclass correlation that ignores mean differences. In addition, if rater variances also differ, then the value of weighted kappa will be decreased relative to the value of the product-moment correlation. Equality constraints on the rater means and variances are given to illustrate the relationships between weighted kappa, the intraclass correlation, and the product-moment correlation. In addition, the expression for weighted kappa shows that weighted kappa belongs to the Zegers-ten Berge family of chance-corrected association coefficients. More specifically, weighted kappa is equivalent to the chance-corrected identity coefficient.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cohen's quadratically weighted kappa equals Lin's concordance correlation coefficient.
“Furthermore, this kappa coefficient equals Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (Andres & Hernandez, 2020;Carrasco, 2010;King & Chinchilli, 2001;Kvålseth, 2018;Schuster, 2004).”
From Quadratically Weighted Agreement Coefficients: Interpretations and Connections (2026) · cites this paper as Schuster, 2004
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 23,433 · see citing works
Agresti, A. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471249688 · Cited by 6,746 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Role of the Crowd in Countering Misinformation: A Case Study of the COVID-19 Infodemic
Micallef, N., He, B., Kumar, S., Ahamad, M., & Memon, N. (2020) · 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) · doi:10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9377956 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
SoK: Content Moderation in Social Media, from Guidelines to Enforcement, and Research to Practice
Singhal, M., Ling, C., Paudel, P., Thota, P., Kumarswamy, N., Stringhini, G., & Nilizadeh, S. (2023) · 2023 IEEE 8th European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) · doi:10.1109/eurosp57164.2023.00056 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
van Oest, R., & Girard, J. M. (2021) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000412 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Quadratically Weighted Agreement Coefficients: Interpretations and Connections
van Oest, R., & Moss, J. (2026) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1017/psy.2026.10085
- Authors
- Schuster, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schuster, Christof
- ORCID
- Schuster, Christof
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 243-253
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3888
- OpenAlex
- W1979317641
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Multidisciplinary Science and Engineering Research
- Keywords
- weighted kappa, rater agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient, product moment correlation, metric scale, inter-rater reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review