Cited by 160Creativity in Education and NeurosciencePsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

The Latent Structure and Measurement Invariance of Scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking–Figural

Kim, Kyung Hee, Cramond, Bonnie, Bandalos, Deborah L.·2006·Educational and Psychological Measurement

Abstract

There is disagreement among researchers as to whether creativity is a unidimensional or multidimensional trait. Much of the debate centers around the most widely used measure of creativity, the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). This study used data from 1,000 kindergartners (ages 5-7), 1,000 third graders (ages 7-11) and 1,000 sixth graders (ages 10-13). Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted for both the two-factor model and one-factor model to determine which fit the data better. Measurement invariance across genders and grade levels was assessed using multiple group analyses in which sets of parameters were freed sequentially in a series of hierarchically nested models. The findings indicate that the structure of TTCT scores is consistent with a two-factor theory. Also, the results of the multiple group analyses indicate that model parameters for gender groups are more invariant than for grade levels in determining the fit of the model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0013164405282456

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most validity studies have focused on the TTCT Figural, while studies on the TTCT Verbal are scarce.

    “In general, most validity studies have focused on the TTCT Figural (Heausler & Thompson, 1988;Kim, 2006a,b;Kim et al., 2006;Krumm & Lemos, 2011;Krumm et al., 2014;Prieto S anchez, L opez Mart ınez, Ferr andiz Garc ıa & Bermejo Garc ıa, 2003) being scarce those studies regarding the TTCT Verbal.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, K. H., Cramond, B., & Bandalos, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Eastern Michigan University (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Kyung Hee
Venue
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Published
2006-06
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
459-477
ISSN
  • 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3888
OpenAlex
W2033209011
Cited by
160
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, creativity, latent structure, measurement invariance, two-factor model, one-factor model, gender differences, grade level differences, children, factor structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review