The Latent Structure and Measurement Invariance of Scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking–Figural
Abstract
There is disagreement among researchers as to whether creativity is a unidimensional or multidimensional trait. Much of the debate centers around the most widely used measure of creativity, the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). This study used data from 1,000 kindergartners (ages 5-7), 1,000 third graders (ages 7-11) and 1,000 sixth graders (ages 10-13). Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted for both the two-factor model and one-factor model to determine which fit the data better. Measurement invariance across genders and grade levels was assessed using multiple group analyses in which sets of parameters were freed sequentially in a series of hierarchically nested models. The findings indicate that the structure of TTCT scores is consistent with a two-factor theory. Also, the results of the multiple group analyses indicate that model parameters for gender groups are more invariant than for grade levels in determining the fit of the model.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most validity studies have focused on the TTCT Figural, while studies on the TTCT Verbal are scarce.
“In general, most validity studies have focused on the TTCT Figural (Heausler & Thompson, 1988;Kim, 2006a,b;Kim et al., 2006;Krumm & Lemos, 2011;Krumm et al., 2014;Prieto S anchez, L opez Mart ınez, Ferr andiz Garc ıa & Bermejo Garc ıa, 2003) being scarce those studies regarding the TTCT Verbal.”
From Factor Structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking Verbal Form B in a Spanish‐speaking Population (2016) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2006
Cites
Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5 · Cited by 16,280 · see citing works
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298 · see citing works
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408 · see citing works
Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance׳s (1958 to present) longitudinal data
Plucker, J. A. (1999) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1202_3 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
A Longitudinal Examination of the Fourth Grade Slump in Creativity
Torrance, E. P. (1968) · Gifted Child Quarterly · doi:10.1177/001698626801200401 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wei, D., Yang, J., Li, W., Wang, K., Zhang, Q., & Qiu, J. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.09.004 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Krumm, G., Aranguren, M., Arán Filippetti, V., & Lemos, V. (2016) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.76 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Grier, R. A. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343412444606 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kim, K. H., Cramond, B., & Bandalos, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Eastern Michigan University (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Kyung Hee
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 459-477
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3888
- OpenAlex
- W2033209011
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, creativity, latent structure, measurement invariance, two-factor model, one-factor model, gender differences, grade level differences, children, factor structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review