Cited by 37Military Strategy and TechnologyHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyCognitive Abilities and Testing

Military Cognitive Readiness at the Operational and Strategic Levels: A Theoretical Model for Measurement Development

Grier, Rebecca A.·2012·Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

Abstract

Military cognitive readiness is a somewhat new concept that has been defined many ways. In this article, I review these definitions and propose that cognitive readiness is not just one construct, but three inter-related constructs akin to the military levels of war and readiness (tactical, operational, & strategic). Each of these constructs requires cognitive performance in complex, uncertain, and stressful military operations. However, the nature of performance is different for each. Thus, each level of cognitive readiness requires different measures. As a first step in the development of measures for operational and strategic cognitive readiness, a review of research related to predicting cognitive performance in complex, uncertain, and stressful operations was conducted. From this review a set of inherent psychological factors and their measures were identified. The article concludes by indicating what future steps are needed to develop measures of both operational and strategic readiness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1555343412444606

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The future of modern defense may not be determined solely by kinetic firepower, but increasingly by human factor, grounded in the integration of cognitive neuroscience and AI.

    “It suggests that the future of modern defense may not be determined solely by kinetic firepower, but increasingly by human factor (Fletcher and Wind, 2013; Grier, 2012), grounded in the integration of cognitive neuroscience and AI (Taddeo and Floridi, 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grier, R. A.
Affiliations
Institute For Defense Analyses (US)
Corresponding author
Grier, Rebecca A.
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Published
2012-04-25
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
358-392
ISSN
1555-3434 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098852844
Cited by
37
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Military Strategy and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
operational readiness, strategic readiness, tactical readiness, levels of war, cognitive performance, psychological factors, military decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review