Rotation criteria and hypothesis testing for exploratory factor analysis: Implications for factor pattern loadings and interfactor correlations
Abstract
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) has long been used in the social sciences to depict the relationships between variables/items and latent traits. Researchers face many choices when using EFA, including the choice of rotation criterion, which can be difficult given that few research articles have discussed and/or demonstrated their differences. The goal of the current study is to help fill this gap by reviewing and demonstrating the utility of several rotation criteria. Furthermore, this article discusses and demonstrates the importance of using factor pattern loading standard errors for hypothesis testing. The choice of a rotation criterion and the use of standard errors in evaluating factor loadings are essential so researchers can make informed decisions concerning the factor structure. This study demonstrates that depending on the rotation criterion selected, and the complexity of the factor pattern matrix, the interfactor correlations and factor pattern loadings can vary substantially. It is also illustrated that the magnitude of the factor loading standard errors can result in different factor structures. Implications and future directions are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Oblique rotation is preferred when developing a new scale.
“Oblique rotation is preferred when developing a new scale (Schmitt & Sass, 2011)”
From Measuring undergraduate students’ reliance on generative AI during problem-solving: Scale development and validation. (2025) · cites this paper as Schmitt & Sass, 2011
Cites
Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164405282485 · Cited by 2,454 · see citing works
PROMAX: A QUICK METHOD FOR ROTATION TO OBLIQUE SIMPLE STRUCTURE
Hendrickson, A. E., & White, P. O. (1964) · British Journal of Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1964.tb00244.x · Cited by 1,009 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study
Greene, A. L., Eaton, N. R., Li, K., Forbes, M. K., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Waldman, I. D., Cicero, D. C., Conway, C. C., Docherty, A. R., et al. (2019) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000434 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Zhang, C.-Q., Chung, P.-K., & Si, G. (2017) · Journal of Sport and Health Science · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2015.09.010 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Hou, C., Zhu, G., Sudarshan, V., Lim, F. S., & Ong, Y. S. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105329 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Zhang, C.-Q., Chung, P.-K., Si, G., & Gucciardi, D. F. (2016) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.02.006 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schmitt, T. A., & Sass, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Eastern Michigan University (US)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schmitt, Thomas A.
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-01-13
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-113
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3888
- OpenAlex
- W2041106420
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 15.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- exploratory factor analysis, hypothesis testing, factor structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review