Cited by 257Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Methods and ApplicationsMental Health Research Topics

Rotation criteria and hypothesis testing for exploratory factor analysis: Implications for factor pattern loadings and interfactor correlations

Schmitt, Thomas A., Sass, Daniel A.·2011·Educational and Psychological Measurement

Abstract

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) has long been used in the social sciences to depict the relationships between variables/items and latent traits. Researchers face many choices when using EFA, including the choice of rotation criterion, which can be difficult given that few research articles have discussed and/or demonstrated their differences. The goal of the current study is to help fill this gap by reviewing and demonstrating the utility of several rotation criteria. Furthermore, this article discusses and demonstrates the importance of using factor pattern loading standard errors for hypothesis testing. The choice of a rotation criterion and the use of standard errors in evaluating factor loadings are essential so researchers can make informed decisions concerning the factor structure. This study demonstrates that depending on the rotation criterion selected, and the complexity of the factor pattern matrix, the interfactor correlations and factor pattern loadings can vary substantially. It is also illustrated that the magnitude of the factor loading standard errors can result in different factor structures. Implications and future directions are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0013164410387348

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmitt, T. A., & Sass, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Eastern Michigan University (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Corresponding author
Schmitt, Thomas A.
Venue
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Published
2011-01-13
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
95-113
ISSN
  • 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3888
OpenAlex
W2041106420
Cited by
257
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
15.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
exploratory factor analysis, hypothesis testing, factor structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review