The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Note on Rank Biserial Correlation
Abstract
variables, n consecutive ranks, a dichotomy, a trichotomy, etc. In this paper we shall be concerned with developing a measure of the correlation between one variable comprising n consecutive untied ranks and a second variable comprising a dichotomy. We shall regard the dichotomy (scored 0, 1) as having a ranking variable underlying it. In this regard it is analogous to the assumption made in biserial correlation that a normally distributed variable has been forced into a dichotomy. Of major interest is a surprising equivalence which results between the coefficient found in this paper and a coefficient due to Cureton (1956). It is to present and prove the equivalence of these two coefficients, which though quite different in origin and derivation are algebraically equivalent, that this paper is being written.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For paired two-sample nonparametric analysis, matched-pairs rank biserial r is used as an effect size.
“For paired two-sample nonparametric analysis, matched-pairs rank biserial r is used as an effect size. It is the difference between the ratio of the positive rank-sum to the total rank-sum and the ratio of the negative rank-sum to the total rank-sum (Glass, 1966; Kerby, 2014).”
From Increasing high school teachers self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice (2020) · cites this paper as Glass, 1966
Citations
Cites
Cureton, E. E. (1956) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289138 · Cited by 313
(2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-22759-8_2 · Cited by 271
THE THEORY OF CORRELATION BETWEEN TWO CONTINUOUS VARIABLES WHEN ONE IS DICHOTOMIZED
Tate, R. F. (1955) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/42.1-2.205 · Cited by 84
Inversions and Rank Correlation Coefficients
Durbin, J., & Stuart, A. (1951) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00095.x · Cited by 80
Burt, C., Norton, H. W., & Kelley, T. L. (1948) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2280380 · Cited by 80
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Siegel, S., 1956, Nonparametric Methods for the Behavioral Sciences
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit
Cohen, J. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026256 · Cited by 8,736
Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Holland, J. D., & Han, J. (2020) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00211-w · Cited by 238
“It is the difference between the ratio of the positive rank-sum to the total rank-sum and the ratio of the negative rank-sum to the total rank-sum (Glass, 1966; Kerby, 2014).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Glass, G. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Glass, Gene V.
- ORCID
- Glass, Gene V.
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1966-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 623-631
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3888
- OpenAlex
- W2054610378
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Multidisciplinary Science and Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Keywords
- binary variables, ordinal rank, rank correlation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review