The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the Effects of Environmental Experience on Attachment to Urban Natural Areas
Abstract
This study explored the relationship between place attachment and both environmental experience and environmental attributes within three urban natural areas in Michigan. To understand these relationships, 328 park users—including neighbors, visitors, volunteers, and staff—were asked about their attachment, use, environmental knowledge, and attitudes toward management using a photo questionnaire. The results showed that attachment has different manifestations related to experience—a place-specific attachment was generally held by neighbors and recreational users, whereas a conceptual attachment was held by volunteers, staff, and those with extensive natural-areas knowledge. Each form of attachment was associated with distinctive perspectives on management. The study showed that the expert’s vision of appropriate management of a natural area may differ from those of neighbors and users, which can readily lead to conflict. If, however, attachment is recognized as a multifaceted and far-reaching component of people’s relationship to a place, such conflicts can be mitigated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Messy Ecosystems, Orderly Frames
Nassauer, J. I. (1995) · Landscape Journal · doi:10.3368/lj.14.2.161 · Cited by 891
Cited by
Using social media to quantify nature-based tourism and recreation
Wood, S. A., Guerry, A. D., Silver, J. M., & Lacayo, M. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02976 · Cited by 720
Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences
Tam, K.-P. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004 · Cited by 687
Determinants of restorative experiences in everyday favorite places
Korpela, K. M., Ylén, M., Tyrväinen, L., & Silvennoinen, H. (2008) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.008 · Cited by 560
Cleary, A., Fielding, K. S., Bell, S. L., Murray, Z., & Roiko, A. (2017) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.003 · Cited by 165
Diep, L., Parikh, P., Duarte, B. P. D. S., Bourget, A. F., Dodman, D., & Martins, J. R. S. (2022) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2022.06.020 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryan, R. L.
- Venue
- Environment and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-42
- ISSN
- 0013-9165 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-390X
- OpenAlex
- W2066689508
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the Effects of Environmental Experience on Attachment to Urban Natural Areas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0013916504264147
- The paper
- Ryan, R. L. (2005). Exploring the Effects of Environmental Experience on Attachment to Urban Natural Areas. Environment and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504264147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.