The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Farmer Perspectives on Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation: The Roles of Trust in Sources of Climate Information, Climate Change Beliefs, and Perceived Risk
Open accessAbstract
Agriculture is vulnerable to climate change and a source of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Farmers face pressures to adjust agricultural systems to make them more resilient in the face of increasingly variable weather (adaptation) and reduce GHG production (mitigation). This research examines relationships between Iowa farmers’ trust in environmental or agricultural interest groups as sources of climate information, climate change beliefs, perceived climate risks to agriculture, and support for adaptation and mitigation responses. Results indicate that beliefs varied with trust, and beliefs in turn had a significant direct effect on perceived risks from climate change. Support for adaptation varied with perceived risks, while attitudes toward GHG reduction (mitigation) were associated predominantly with variation in beliefs. Most farmers were supportive of adaptation responses, but few endorsed GHG reduction, suggesting that outreach should focus on interventions that have adaptive and mitigative properties (e.g., reduced tillage, improved fertilizer management).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Climate change 2007: the physical science basis
Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Marquis, M. C., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., Miller, H. L., & Chen, Z. (2007) · Cited by 23,383
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,442
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118619179 · Cited by 17,277
Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P., & Hanson, C. (2007) · Centre for Environmental Data Analysis Digital Repository (Centre for Environmental Data Analysis) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7356334 · Cited by 9,136
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change
Change, I. P. O. C. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511546013 · Cited by 7,729
A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291170 · Cited by 7,330 · cited 1×
“The Tucker–Lewis goodness-of-fit index (TLI) measures the incremental improvement in a model’s fit to the observed covariance structure over a null model and typically ranges from 0 to 1 (Tucker & Lewis, 1973).”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 25x’25 Adaptation Initiative, 2013, Agriculture and forestry in a changing climate: Adaptation recommendations
- 10.1023/A:1024043714247 · doi:10.1023/a:1024043714247
- American Farm Bureau Federation, 2012, Clean air act-greenhouse gas regulation
- Climate Change Position Statement Working Group, 2011, Position statement on climate change
- Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, 2011, Carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas fluxes in agriculture: Challenges and opportunities
- Cox C., 2011, Losing ground
- 10.2307/2580124 · doi:10.2307/2580124
- Iowa Corn Growers Association, 2011, 2012 policy of the Iowa Corn Growers Association
- Iowa Department of Natural Resources, 2012, 2011 Iowa statewide greenhouse gas emissions inventory report
- Leiserowitz A., 2009, Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes
- Marx S. M., 2012, Climate change in the great lakes region: Navigating an uncertain future, 99
- 10.1007/s10584-010-9833-6 · doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9833-6
- Mutel C., 2007, The emerald horizon: The history of nature in Iowa
- National Research Council, 2010, Adapting to the impacts of climate change: America’s climate choices
- National Research Council, 2010, Advancing the science of climate change: America’s climate choices
- 10.2489/jswc.68.2.50A · doi:10.2489/jswc.68.2.50a
- Peterson J. B., 1946, A century of farming in Iowa, 18
- Rogovska N., 2011, Climate change consequences for agriculture in Iowa climate change impacts on Iowa 2010
- Roser-Renouf C., 2008, International Journal of Sustainability Communication, 3, 37
- Soil Conservation Service, 1983, Des Moines river basin study: Drainage report
- Stern P. C., 1999, Human Ecology Review, 6, 81
- 10.1177/1086026612456536 · DOI
- Union of Concerned Scientists. (2010). Climate scientists’ letter to the American Farm Bureau. Cambridge, MA: Author. Retrieved from http://ucsusa.org/assets/documents/global_warming/climate-scientists-letter-to.pdf
- U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2009, 2007 census of agriculture: Iowa
- U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2012, Iowa’s rank in United States agriculture
Cited by
Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture and Its Mitigation Strategies: A Review
Malhi, G., Kaur, M., & Kaushik, P. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13031318 · Cited by 1,511
Dessart, F. J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., & van Bavel, R. (2019) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbz019 · Cited by 1,050
Zhang, L., Ruiz-Menjivar, J., Luo, B., Liang, Z., & Swisher, M. E. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101408 · Cited by 292
Deng, Y., Wang, M., & Yousefpour, R. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.022 · Cited by 118
Motivation and climate change: A review
Brick, C., Bosshard, A., & Whitmarsh, L. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.001 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Arbuckle, J. G., Morton, L. W., & Hobbs, J.
- Venue
- Environment and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-10-07
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-234
- ISSN
- 0013-9165 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-390X
- OpenAlex
- W2098786089
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 28.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Farmer Perspectives on Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation: The Roles of Trust in Sources of Climate Information, Climate Change Beliefs, and Perceived Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0013916513503832
- The paper
- Arbuckle, J. G., Morton, L. W., & Hobbs, J. (2015). Understanding Farmer Perspectives on Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation: The Roles of Trust in Sources of Climate Information, Climate Change Beliefs, and Perceived Risk. Environment and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513503832
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
