Cited by 76Climate Change Communication and PerceptionEnvironmental Education and SustainabilitySocial and Intergroup Psychology

Motivation and climate change: A review

Open access
Brick, Cameron, Bosshard, Anna, Whitmarsh, Lorraine·2021·Current Opinion in Psychology

Abstract

This paper reviews motivations people experience about climate change and integrates recent findings into the BUCkET model of core social goals. We argue that environmentalism is not the main cause of thoughts or behaviors about climate change. Rather, the evolved social needs for Belongingness, Understanding, Control, self-Enhancement, and Trust are more practical intervention targets than the attempt to create environmentalist beliefs or identities. We used database searches to identify the key research areas on motivation and climate change and synthesized articles into the BUCkET model. This reveals some limiting assumptions of previous approaches and suggests the effectiveness of targeting existing motives rather than fostering new values or worldviews.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.001

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brick et al. state that a person's desire for self-enhancement may be used as a motivational drive for environmentalist belief and behaviour, and informing individuals of the co-benefits of an eco-friendly identity may improve the likelihood of eco-friendly behaviour.

    “Brick et al. state that a person's desire for self-enhancement may be used as a motivational drive for environmentalist belief and behaviour.Informing individuals of the co-benefits of an eco-friendly identity, such as a sense of development and benevolence, may improve the likelihood of eco-friendly behaviour [49].”

    From Climate Distress: A Review of Current Psychological Research and Practice (2023) · cites this paper as [49]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Group polarisation and perceiving the beliefs of close friends and family members may be a large factor in whether information is ignored, depreciated, or embraced.

    “Group polarisation and perceiving the beliefs of close friends and family members may be a large factor in whether information is ignored, depreciated, or embraced [48][49][50].”

    From Climate Distress: A Review of Current Psychological Research and Practice (2023) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Self-Enhancing section says identity-threatening environmental information may be ignored or denigrated and that motivated reasoning can produce attitude polarization. The Belonging and Understanding sections describe the influence of social norms and perceived consensus on beliefs. The paper does not specifically identify the perceived beliefs of close friends and family as a factor in whether information is ignored, denigrated, or embraced. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Motivation may be cultivated by increasing a sense of individual and collective efficacy through climate action, fostering a sense of altruism, and emphasising the positive effects of climate change mitigation.

    “The literature suggests that motivation may be cultivated by increasing a sense of individual and collective efficacy through climate action [46,49,50,53], fostering a sense of altruism [44], and emphasising the positive effects of climate change mitigation [50].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brick, C., Bosshard, A., & Whitmarsh, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Brick, Cameron
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
42
Pages
82-88
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3160324164
Cited by
76
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/S012257/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
bucket model, environmentalism, sense of belonging, self-enhancement, trust, control, understanding, climate change interventions
MeSH terms
Environmentalism, Humans, Motivation, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review