Cited by 102Crime Patterns and InterventionsUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisNight-time city culture

Illuminating for safety: Investigating the role of lighting appraisals on the perception of safety in the urban environment

Open access
van Rijswijk, Leon, Haans, Antal·2018·Environment and Behavior

Abstract

In two studies, we took a prospect–refuge based perspective to investigate how lighting and other physical attributes (i.e., prospect, concealment, and entrapment) affect people’s judgments of the safety of urban streets during nighttime. Both studies complement existing research, which predominantly use factorial designs, with more ecologically valid correlational research using a large and representative sample of urban streets as stimulus materials. Results from Study 1 corroborate existing research demonstrating that differences in prospect, concealment, and entrapment predicted, to a large extent, variation in the perceived safety of urban streets—thus demonstrating the utility of such environmental information for making safety judgments in real-life settings. Results from a mediation analysis conducted in Study 2 showed that the relation between appraisals of lighting quality and safety judgments was completely accounted for by co-occurring variation in appraisals of prospect and entrapment. Implications for theory and methodology are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0013916517718888

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Opportunities for escape have the largest effect on perception of safety particularly at night, because lack of escape opportunity may increase feeling of anxiety lowering women's perception of safety.

    “Opportunities for escape have the largest effect on perception of safety particularly at night, because lack of escape opportunity may increase feeling of anxiety lowering women's perception of safety.”

    From Women's perceived safety in public places and public transport: A narrative review of contributing factors and measurement methods (2025) · cites this paper as van Rijswijk and Haans, 2018

    The General Discussion (page unavailable) says that escape-opportunity appraisals had the largest effect on perceived environmental safety at night, and that greater entrapment was associated with lower perceived safety. It does not establish that anxiety explains this association or that the finding specifically concerns women. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • van Rijswijk and Haans (2018) found that high prospect is positively related to environmental perceived safety and a negative correlation exist between perceived safety and levels concealment and escape at night under different lighting conditions.

    “van Rijs­ wijk and Haans (2018) found that high prospect is positively related to environmental perceived safety and a negative correlation exist between perceived safety and levels concealment and escape at night under different lighting conditions.”

    From Women's perceived safety in public places and public transport: A narrative review of contributing factors and measurement methods (2025) · cites this paper as van Rijswijk and Haans, 2018

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The study also found mediating effects of environmental characteristics on perception of safety indirectly influenced by street lighting.

    “The study also found mediating effects of envi­ ronmental characteristics on perception of safety indirectly influenced by street lighting.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Caminada J. F. Van Bommel W. J. M. (1980). New lighting considerations for residential areas. International Lighting Review, 3, 69- 75.
  2. Crowe T. (2000). Crime prevention through environmental design: Applications of architectural design and space management concepts (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  3. Painter K. (1994). The impact of street lighting on crime, fear of crime, and pedestrian street use. Security Journal, 5, 116- 124.
  4. Pease K. (1999). A review of street lighting evaluations: Crime reduction effects. In Painter K. A. Tilley N. (Eds.), Crime Prevention Studies: Vol. 10. Surveillance of public space: CCTV, street lighting and crime prevention (pp. 47- 76). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Rijswijk, L., & Haans, A.
Affiliations
  • Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Haans, Antal
Venue
Environment and Behavior
Published
2017-07-20
Volume
50
Issue
8
Pages
889-912
ISSN
  • 0013-9165 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-390X
OpenAlex
W2738800075
Cited by
102
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environment and Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Agentschap NL (Point One scheme)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Night-time city culture
Keywords
lighting quality, perceived safety, urban streets, night, prospect-refuge theory, concealment, entrapment, prospects, environmental assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review