The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Windows in the Workplace: Sunlight, View, and Occupational Stress
Abstract
This article investigates the direct and indirect effects of windows in the workplace onjob satisfaction, intention to quit, and general well-being. The impact of three specific influencing mechanisms are examined: general level of illumination, sunlight penetration, and view. The extent to which these environmental features might moderate the negative consequences of job stress is investigated. The sample consisted of 100 white-and blue-collar workers who were employed in a large wine-producing organization in the Mediterranean region of Southern Europe. The results showed a significant direct effect for sunlight penetration on job satisfaction, intention to quit, and general well-being. A view of natural elements (i.e., trees, vegetation, plants, and foliage) was found to buffer the negative impact of job stress on intention to quit and to have a similar, albeit marginal, effect on general well-being. No effects for general level of illumination were found.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Antidepressant effects of light in seasonal affective disorder
(1985) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.142.2.163 · Cited by 339
Cited by
The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health
Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., & Daily, G. C. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x · Cited by 1,275
What are the benefits of interacting with nature?
Keniger, L., Gaston, K., Irvine, K., & Fuller, R. (2013) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph10030913 · Cited by 1,204
The Nature of the View from Home: Psychological Benefits
Kaplan, R. (2001) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/00139160121973115 · Cited by 1,172
The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise
Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M., & Griffin, M. (2005) · International Journal of Environmental Health Research · doi:10.1080/09603120500155963 · Cited by 1,128
The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition
Bratman, G. N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B. J., & Gross, J. J. (2015) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.005 · Cited by 939
Metadata
- Authors
- Leather, P., Pyrgas, M., Beale, D., & Lawrence, C.
- Venue
- Environment and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 739-762
- ISSN
- 0013-9165 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-390X
- OpenAlex
- W2086095591
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Windows in the Workplace: Sunlight, View, and Occupational Stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001391659803000601
- The paper
- Leather, P., Pyrgas, M., Beale, D., & Lawrence, C. (1998). Windows in the Workplace: Sunlight, View, and Occupational Stress. Environment and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
