Cited by 1,275Urban Green Space and HealthEnvironmental Philosophy and EthicsRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management

The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health

Bratman, Gregory N., Hamilton, J. Paul, Daily, Gretchen C.·2012·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Scholars spanning a variety of disciplines have studied the ways in which contact with natural environments may impact human well‐being. We review the effects of such nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health, synthesizing work from environmental psychology, urban planning, the medical literature, and landscape aesthetics. We provide an overview of the prevailing explanatory theories of these effects, the ways in which exposure to nature has been considered, and the role that individuals’ preferences for nature may play in the impact of the environment on psychological functioning. Drawing from the highly productive but disparate programs of research in this area, we conclude by proposing a system of categorization for different types of nature experience. We also outline key questions for future work, including further inquiry into which elements of the natural environment may have impacts on cognitive function and mental health; what the most effective type, duration, and frequency of contact may be; and what the possible neural mechanisms are that could be responsible for the documented effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., & Daily, G. C.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Bratman, Gregory N.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02
Volume
1249
Issue
1
Pages
118-136
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W1947988280
Cited by
1,275
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 105 · 2025: 135 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 144 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 114 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center For Environmental Assessment
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Keywords
nature experience, cognitive function, mental health, well-being, landscape aesthetics, urban planning, environmental psychology, neural mechanisms
MeSH terms
Cognition, Biological Evolution, Humans, Mental Health, Models, Psychological, Ecosystem, Nature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review