The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Family Outcomes in Early Intervention: Findings from a Large-Scale Assessment
Abstract
This article reports data from a large-scale assessment using the Family Outcomes Survey with families participating in early intervention. The study was designed to determine how families describe themselves with regard to outcomes achieved, the extent to which outcomes are interrelated, and the extent to which child, family, and program factors are associated with outcomes. Families reported positive outcomes, but there was variability in their responses. Factor analysis revealed that outcomes clustered in two areas: (a) family knowledge and ability, and (b) family support and community services. Hierarchical linear models indicated race/ethnicity, income, time in early intervention, perception of early intervention, and family-centered services were related to family outcomes. Recommendations for how to best use survey data are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When studies included race, ethnicity, and income factors, they found poorer outcomes for families from minoritized racial and ethnic groups and among families with lower income levels.
“Importantly, when these studies included race, ethnicity, and income factors in their analyses, they found poorer outcomes for families from minoritized racial and ethnic groups, as well as among families with lower income levels (Bailey et al., 2005, 2007; Raspa et al., 2010).”
From Parenting Stress, Child Social Functioning, and Part C Early Intervention in Predominantly Low-Income Families of Children With or at High Risk for Developmental Delay From Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups (2023) · cites this paper as Raspa et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models
Singer, J. D. (1998) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.2307/1165280 · Cited by 1,092
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1177/105381510102400101 · DOI
- 10.1177/105381510602800401 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.IYC.0000324549.31822.c3 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.113.4.887 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.2004-1239 · DOI
- 10.1177/001440299806400302 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.2006-2775 · DOI
- 10.1177/001440290407000203 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511529320.026 · DOI
- Bruder M. B., 2001, Early childhood inclusion: Focus on change, 203
- Bryk A. S., 1992, Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods
- Carpenter B., 1997, Families in context: Emerging trends in early intervention family support
- 10.1177/0271121408316699 · DOI
- 10.1080/10349120701488723 · DOI
- 10.1177/027112149901900302 · DOI
- 10.1177/027112140002000205 · DOI
- Dunst C. J., 1994, Supporting and strengthening families, Vol. 1: Methods, strategies, practices
- Early Childhood Research Institute on Measuring Growth and Development, 1998, Family outcomes in a growth and development model
- Horn E., 2004, Family-based practices
- 10.1177/109625060300600303 · DOI
- 10.1352/0895-8017(2000)105<0032:MOCIFC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- Krauss M. W., 1997, The effectiveness of early intervention, 611
- 10.1177/027112149401400106 · DOI
- McWilliam R. A., 2005, A developmental systems approach to early intervention, 215
- 10.1177/105381519501900105 · DOI
- Olmsted M. G., Topics in Early Childhood Special Education
- 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00497.x · DOI
- 10.1177/105381519902200207 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511529320.009 · DOI
- 10.1177/001440290407000406 · DOI
- 10.3102/10769986023004323 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/10694-000 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/001440299706400107 · DOI
- Trivette C. M., 2005, DEC recommended practice: A comprehensive guide for practical application, 107
- 10.1017/CBO9780511529320.029 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kuhn, J., Hickey, E., Lindly, O., Stransky, M., Masaro, M., Patts, G. J., Cabral, H., Crossman, M., Augustyn, M., Feinberg, E., et al. (2023) · Journal of Early Intervention · doi:10.1177/10538151231155406 · Cited by 3
“Raspa et al. (2010)’s analysis of large-scale Family Outcomes Survey data revealed that race and income as well as time spent in Part C EI predicted parents feeling confident and competent in parenting a child with special needs and that race and income, not Part C EI services, predicted families…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Raspa, M., Bailey, D. B., Olmsted, M. G., Nelson, R., Robinson, N., Simpson, M. E., Guillen, C., & Houts, R.
- Affiliations
- RTI International (US)
- Texas Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services, Division of Early Childhood Intervention
- Illinois Department of Human Services (US)
- Graham Hospital School of Nursing
- Illinois Early Intervention Training Program
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Raspa, Melissa
- Venue
- Exceptional Children
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 496-510
- ISSN
- 0014-4029 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-5560
- OpenAlex
- W2135044680
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Exceptional Children (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
- Keywords
- early intervention, family outcomes, family-centered services, race and ethnicity, income, program factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review